PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Medium Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
Barb\u{a}lat's lemma (Theorem)
Lemma 1 (Barbălat)   Let $ f \colon (0,\infty) \to {\mathbb{R}}$ be Riemann integrable and uniformly continuous then
$\displaystyle \lim_{t \to \infty} f(t) = 0 .$    

Note that if $ f$ is non-negative, then Riemann integrability is the same as being $ L^1$ in the sense of Lebesgue, but if $ f$ oscillates then the Lebesgue integral may not exist.

Further note that the uniform continuity is required to prevent sharp “spikes” that might prevent the limit from existing. For example suppose we add a spike of height 1 and area $ 2^{-n}$ at every integer. Then the function is continuous and $ L^1$ (and thus Riemann integrable), but $ f(t)$ would not have a limit at infinity.

Bibliography

1
Hartmut Logemann, Eugene P. Ryan. Asymptotic behaviour of nonlinear systems. The American Mathematical Monthly, 111(10):864-889, 2004.



"Barb\u{a}lat's lemma" is owned by jirka.
(view preamble)

View style:

Other names:  Barbalat's lemma

Attachments:
proof of Barbalat's lemma (Proof) by ncrom
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: infinity, continuous, function, integer, area, height, limit, uniform continuity, Lebesgue integral, uniformly continuous, Riemann integrable

This is version 4 of Barb\u{a}lat's lemma, born on 2004-12-10, modified 2005-04-09.
Object id is 6552, canonical name is BarbualatsLemma.
Accessed 3395 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC26A06 (Real functions :: Functions of one variable :: One-variable calculus)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 2 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | prove | add result | add corollary | add example | add (any)