|
|
|
|
Birkhoff prime ideal theorem
|
(Theorem)
|
|
|
Birkhoff Prime Ideal Theorem. Let $L$ be a distributive lattice and $I$ a proper lattice ideal of $L$ . Pick any element $a\notin I$ . Then there is a prime ideal $P$ in $L$ such that $I\subseteq P$ and $a\notin P$ .
Proof. If $I$ is prime, then we are done. Let $S:=\lbrace J\mid J\mbox{ is an ideal in }L\mbox{, and }a\notin J\rbrace$ . Then $I\in S$ . Order $S$ by inclusion. This turns $S$ into a poset. Let $C$ be a chain in $S$ . Let $K=\bigcup C$ . If $x,y\in K$ , then
$x\in J_1$ and $y\in J_2$ for some ideals $J_1,J_2\in C$ . Since $C$ is a chain, we may assume that $J_1\subseteq J_2$ , so that $x\in J_2$ as well. This means $x\vee y\in J_2\subseteq K$ . Next, assume $x\in K$ and $y\le x$ . Then $x\in J$ for some ideal $J\in C$ , so that $y\in J\subseteq K$ also. This shows that $K$ is an ideal. If $a\in K$ , then $a\in J$ for some $J\in C\subseteq S$ , contradicting the definition of $S$ . So $a\notin K$ and $K\in S$ also. This shows that every chain in $S$ has an upper bound. We can now appeal to Zorn's lemma, and conclude that $S$ has a maximal element, say $P$ .
We now want to show that $P$ is the candidate that we are seeking: $P$ is a prime ideal in $L$ and $a\notin P$ . Since $P\in S$ , $P$ is an ideal such that $a\notin P$ . So the only thing left to prove is that $P$ is prime. This amounts to showing that if $x\wedge y\in P$ , then $x\in P$ or $y\in P$ . Suppose not: $x,y\notin P$ . Let $Q_1$ be the ideal generated by elements of $P$ and $x$ , and $Q_2$ the ideal generated by $P$ and
$y$ . Since $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ properly contain $P$ , $a\in Q_1$ and $a\in Q_2$ . Write $a\le p_1\vee x$ and $a\le p_2\vee y$ , where $p_1,p_2\in P$ . Then $a\vee p_2\le (p_1\vee p_2)\vee x$ and $a\vee p_1\le (p_1\vee p_2)\vee y$ . Take the meet of these two expressions, and we obtain $(a\vee p_2) \wedge (a\vee p_1)\le ((p_1\vee p_2)\vee x)\wedge((p_1\vee p_2)\vee y)$ . Since $L$ is distributive, on the left hand side, we get $a\vee (p_1\wedge p_2)$ . On the right hand side, we have $(p_1\vee p_2)\vee (x\wedge y)\in P$ . As the left hand side is less than or equal to the right hand side, we get that $a\vee (p_1\wedge p_2)\in P$ . Since $a\le a\vee (p_1\wedge p_2)\in P$ , $a\in P$ , a contradiction. Therefore, $P$ is prime and the proof is complete. 
In the proof, we use the fact that, an element $a\in L$ belongs to the ideal generated by ideals $I_k$ iff $a$ is less than or equal to a finite join of elements, each of which belongs to some $I_k$ .
Remarks.
- The theorem can be generalized: if we use a subset $S\cap I=\varnothing$ instead of an element $a\notin I$ , there is a prime ideal $P$ containing $I$ but excluding $S$ .
- Birkhoff's prime ideal theorem has been shown to be equivalent to the axiom of choice, under ZF.
|
"Birkhoff prime ideal theorem" is owned by CWoo.
|
|
(view preamble | get metadata)
Cross-references: ZF, axiom of choice, equivalent, subset, theorem, join, finite, iff, complete, proof, contradiction, right hand side, left hand side, distributive, expressions, meet, contain, ideal generated by, maximal element, Zorn's lemma, upper bound, ideals, chain, poset, inclusion, order, prime, prime ideal, lattice ideal, distributive lattice
There is 1 reference to this entry.
This is version 6 of Birkhoff prime ideal theorem, born on 2007-05-03, modified 2009-01-23.
Object id is 9325, canonical name is BirkhoffPrimeIdealTheorem.
Accessed 888 times total.
Classification:
| AMS MSC: | 06D05 (Order, lattices, ordered algebraic structures :: Distributive lattices :: Structure and representation theory) | | | 03E25 (Mathematical logic and foundations :: Set theory :: Axiom of choice and related propositions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pending Errata and Addenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|