PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Low Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
Cantor's diagonal argument (Topic)

One of the starting points in Cantor's development of set theory was his discovery that there are different degrees of infinity. The rational numbers, for example, are countably infinite; it is possible to enumerate all the rational numbers by means of an infinite list. By contrast, the real numbers are uncountable. it is impossible to enumerate them by means of an infinite list. These discoveries underlie the idea of cardinality, which is expressed by saying that two sets have the same cardinality if there exists a bijective correspondence between them.

In essence, Cantor discovered two theorems: first, that the set of real numbers has the same cardinality as the power set of the naturals; and second, that a set and its power set have a different cardinality (see Cantor's theorem). The proof of the second result is based on the celebrated diagonalization argument.

Cantor showed that for every given infinite sequence of real numbers $ x_1, x_2, x_3, \ldots$ it is possible to construct a real number $ x$ that is not on that list. Consequently, it is impossible to enumerate the real numbers; they are uncountable. No generality is lost if we suppose that all the numbers on the list are between 0 and $ 1$. Certainly, if this subset of the real numbers in uncountable, then the full set is uncountable as well.

Let us write our sequence as a table of decimal expansions:

\begin{displaymath} \begin{array}{rlllll} 0\;.&d_{11}&d_{12}&d_{13}&d_{14}&\ldot... ...dots\; & \;\vdots&\;\vdots&\;\vdots\;&\vdots&\ddots \end{array}\end{displaymath}
where
$\displaystyle x_n = 0.d_{n1} d_{n2} d_{n3} d_{n4}\ldots,$
and the expansion avoids an infinite trailing string of the digit $ 9$.

For each $ n=1,2,\ldots$ we choose a digit $ c_n$ that is different from $ d_{nn}$ and not equal to $ 9$, and consider the real number $ x$ with decimal expansion

$\displaystyle 0.c_1c_2c_3\ldots$
By construction, this number $ x$ is different from every member of the given sequence. After all, for every $ n$, the number $ x$ differs from the number $ x_n$ in the $ n^{\scriptscriptstyle \text{th}}$ decimal digit. The claim is proven.



"Cantor's diagonal argument" is owned by rmilson. [ full author list (2) | owner history (1) ]
(view preamble)

View style:

See Also: Cantor's theorem

Other names:  Cantor's diagonalization
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: digit, string, decimal expansions, subset, sequence, argument, Cantor's theorem, power set, bijective, cardinality, uncountable, real numbers, infinite, enumerate, countably infinite, rational numbers, infinity, degrees, set theory, development, points
There are 10 references to this entry.

This is version 6 of Cantor's diagonal argument, born on 2002-02-18, modified 2003-01-09.
Object id is 2109, canonical name is CantorsDiagonalArgument.
Accessed 26582 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC03E10 (Mathematical logic and foundations :: Set theory :: Ordinal and cardinal numbers)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 5 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Cantor Diagonal by cleve on 2004-02-05 19:35:36
If "between" means "strictly between" then you want to add "make at least one ci not zero" . For example you might choose c1 first and make it not zero.

[ reply | up ]
oops by akrowne on 2002-02-18 19:40:39
In my correction, I said

X is n (a natural number) such that n \in X only if n \not\in N_x

This should be

X is n (a natural number) such that n \in X only if n \not\in N_n

sorry.

-apk
[ reply | up ]
  • Re: oops by slider142 on 2002-02-18 22:41:04

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)