PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Medium Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] criterion of Néron-Ogg-Shafarevich (Theorem)

In this entry, we use the following notation. $ K$ is a local field, complete with respect to a discrete valuation $ \nu$, $ R$ is the ring of integers of $ K$, $ \mathcal{M}$ is the maximal ideal of $ R$ and $ \mathbb{F}$ is the residue field of $ R$.

Definition 1   Let $ \Xi$ be a set on which $ \operatorname{Gal}(\overline{K}/K)$ acts. We say that $ \Xi$ is unramified at $ \nu$ if the action of the inertia group $ {I_{\nu}}$ on $ \Xi$ is trivial, i.e. $ {\zeta}^{\sigma}=\zeta$ for all $ \sigma \in I_{\nu}$ and for all $ \zeta \in \Xi$.
Theorem 1 (Criterion of N $ {\bf {\acute{e}}}$ron-Ogg-Shafarevich)   Let $ E/K$ be an elliptic curve defined over $ K$. The following are equivalent:
  1. $ E$ has good reduction over $ K$;
  2. $ E[m]$ is unramified at $ \nu$ for all $ m\geq1$, $ \gcd(m,\operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F}))=1$;
  3. The Tate module $ T_l(E)$ is unramified at $ \nu$ for some (all) l, $ l\neq \operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F})$;
  4. $ E[m]$ is unramified at $ \nu$ for infinitely many integers $ m\geq 1$, $ \gcd(m,\operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F}))=1$.
Corollary 1   Let $ E/K$ be an elliptic curve. Then $ E$ has potential good reduction if and only if the inertia group $ I_{\nu}$ acts on $ T_l(E)$ through a finite quotient for some prime $ l\neq \operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F})$.
Proof. [Proof of Corollary] ( $ \Rightarrow$) Assume that $ E$ has potential good reduction. By definition, there exists a finite extension of $ K$, call it $ K'$, such that $ E/K'$ has good reduction. We can extend $ K'$ (if necessary) so $ K'/K$ is a Galois finite extension.

Let $ \nu'$ and $ I_{\nu '}$ be the corresponding valuation and inertia group for $ K'$. Then the theorem above ( (1) $ \Rightarrow$(3) ) implies that $ T_l(E)$ is unramified at $ \nu'$ for all $ l$, $ l\neq \operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F})=\operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F}')$ (since $ \mathbb{F}'$ is a finite extension of $ \mathbb{F}$). So $ I_{\nu '}$ acts trivially on $ T_l(E)$ for all $ l\neq \operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F}')$. Thus $ I_{\nu}\hookrightarrow T_l(E)$ factors through the finite quotient $ I_{\nu}/I_{{\nu}'}$.

( $ \Leftarrow$) Let $ l\neq \operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F})$, and assume $ I_{\nu}\hookrightarrow T_l(E)$ factors through a finite quotient, say $ I_{\nu}/J$. Let $ {\overline{K}}^J$ be the fixed field of $ J$, then $ {\overline{K}}^J/{\overline{K}}^{I_{\nu}}$ is a finite extension, so we can find a finite extension $ K'/K$ so that $ {\overline{K}}^J={K'}{\overline{K}}^{I_{\nu}}$. So the inertia group of $ K'$ is equal to $ J$, and $ J$ acts trivially on $ T_l(E)$. Hence the criterion ( (3) $ \Rightarrow$(1) ) implies that $ E$ has good reduction over $ K'$, and since $ K'/K$ is finite, $ E$ has potential good reduction. $ \qedsymbol$

Proposition 1   Let $ E/K$ be an elliptic curve. Then $ E$ has potential good reduction if and only if its $ j$-invariant is integral ( i.e. $ j(E)\in R$ ).
Proof. ( $ \Leftarrow$) Assume $ \operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F})\neq 2$, it is easy to prove that we can extend $ K$ to a finite extension $ K'$ so that $ E$ has a Weierstrass equation:
$\displaystyle E:y^2=x(x-1)(x-\lambda)\quad \lambda\neq 0,1$ (1)

Since we are assuming $ j(E)\in R$, and:
$\displaystyle (1-\lambda(1-\lambda))^3-j{\lambda}^2(1-\lambda)^2=0$ (2)

then $ \lambda\in R$ and $ \lambda\neq 0,1 \mod \mathcal{M}'$ ( $ \Rightarrow$ $ \Delta '\in (R')^*$ ). Hence $ E/K'$ has good reduction, i.e. $ E$ has potential good reduction.

( $ \Rightarrow$) Assume that $ E$ has potential good reduction, so there exists $ K'$ so that $ E/K'$ has good reduction. Let $ \Delta'$, $ c_4'$ the usual quantities associated to the Weierstrass equation over $ K'$. Since $ E/K'$ has good reduction, $ \Delta '\in (R')^*$, and so $ j(E)={{({c_4}')^3}\over {\Delta '}}\in R'$. But since $ E$ is defined over $ K$, $ j(E)\in K$, so $ j(E)\in K\bigcap{R'}=R$. $ \qedsymbol$



"criterion of Néron-Ogg-Shafarevich" is owned by alozano.
(view preamble)

View style:

See Also: elliptic curve, the arithmetic of elliptic curves

Other names:  criterion of Neron-Ogg-Shafarevich
Keywords:  bad reduction

This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: Weierstrass equation, integral, fixed field, factors, implies, valuation, necessary, finite extension, prime, quotient, finite, acts on, potential, integers, Tate module, good reduction, the following are equivalent, elliptic curve, inertia group, action, unramified, residue field, maximal ideal, ring of integers, discrete valuation, complete, local field
There is 1 reference to this entry.

This is version 1 of criterion of Néron-Ogg-Shafarevich, born on 2007-06-13.
Object id is 9582, canonical name is CriterionOfNeronOggShafarevich.
Accessed 475 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC14H52 (Algebraic geometry :: Curves :: Elliptic curves)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | prove | add result | add corollary | add example | add (any)