PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] determinant as a multilinear mapping (Theorem)

Let $\mM = (M_{ij})$ be an $n\times n$ matrix with entries in a field $K$ . The matrix $\mM$ is really the same thing as a list of $n$ column vectors of size $n$ . Consequently, the determinant operation may be regarded as a mapping $$\det:\overbrace{K^n\times\ldots\times K^n}^{n \mbox{ times}}\rightarrow K$$ The determinant of a matrix $\mM$ is then defined to be $\det(\mM_1,\ldots,\mM_n),$ where $\mM_j\in K^n$ denotes the $j\supth$ column of $\mM$ .

Starting with the definition \begin{equation} \label{eq:detdef} \det(\mM_1,\ldots,\mM_n) = \sum_{\pi\in S_n} \mathrm{sgn}(\pi) M_{1\pi_1} M_{2\pi_2}\cdots M_{n\pi_n} \end{equation}the following properties are easily established:

  1. the determinant is multilinear;
  2. the determinant is anti-symmetric;
  3. the determinant of the identity matrix is $1$ .
These three properties uniquely characterize the determinant, and indeed can -- some would say should -- be used as the definition of the determinant operation.

Let us prove this. We proceed by representing elements of $K^n$ as linear combinations of $$ \be_1=\begin{pmatrix} 1\\0\\0\\\vdots\\0\end{pmatrix},\quad \be_2=\begin{pmatrix} 0\\1\\0\\\vdots\\0\end{pmatrix},\quad \ldots\quad \be_n=\begin{pmatrix} 0\\0\\0\\ \vdots\\1\end{pmatrix}, $$ the standard basis of $K^n$ . Let $\mM$ be an $n\times n$ matrix. The $j\supth$ column is represented as $\sum_i M_{ij}\be_i$ ; whence using multilinearity

$\displaystyle \det(\mathbf{M})$ $\displaystyle = \det\left(\sum_i M_{i1}\mathbf{e}_i\,,\sum_i M_{i2}\mathbf{e}_i\,,\;\ldots\;,\sum_i M_{in} \mathbf{e}_i\right)$    
  $\displaystyle =\sum_{i_1,\ldots,i_n=1}^n M_{i_11} M_{i_22} \cdots M_{i_n n} \det(\mathbf{e}_{i_1},\mathbf{e}_{i_2},\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{i_n})$    

The anti-symmetry assumption implies that the expressions $\det(\be_{i_1},\be_{i_2},\ldots,\be_{i_n})$ vanish if any two of the indices $i_1,\ldots,i_n$ coincide. If all $n$ indices are distinct, $$\det(\be_{i_1},\be_{i_2},\ldots,\be_{i_n}) = \pm \det(\be_1,\ldots,\be_n),$$ the sign in the above expression being determined by the number of transpositions required to rearrange the list $(i_1,\ldots,i_n)$ into the list $(1,\ldots,n)$ . The sign is therefore the parity of the permutation $(i_1,\ldots,i_n)$ . Since we also assume that $$\det(\be_1,\ldots,\be_n)=1,$$ we now recover the original definition ([*]).




"determinant as a multilinear mapping" is owned by rmilson.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: exterior algebra


This object's parent.

Attachments:
basis-free definition of determinant (Definition) by mps
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: permutation, parity, transpositions, number, indices, vanish, expressions, implies, standard basis, linear combinations, identity matrix, anti-symmetric, multilinear, properties, column, mapping, operation, determinant, size, column vectors, field, matrix
There are 2 references to this entry.

This is version 2 of determinant as a multilinear mapping, born on 2002-11-14, modified 2006-01-11.
Object id is 3595, canonical name is DeterminantAsAMultilinearMapping.
Accessed 3873 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC15A15 (Linear and multilinear algebra; matrix theory :: Determinants, permanents, other special matrix functions)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 1 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
basis independance by vitriol on 2002-11-17 15:21:39
a nice way i learnt was to define a volume form to be a map satisfying said properties from U^n -> K and show it's unique upto a constant. then show that the determinant of an endomorphism is well-defined by looking at its action on any basis. I don't know whether this makes things easier or not, any thoughts?
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | prove | add result | add corollary | add example | add (any)