PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] determinant as a multilinear mapping (Theorem)

Let $ \mathbf{M}= (M_{ij})$ be an $ n\times n$ matrix with entries in a field $ K$. The matrix $ \mathbf{M}$ is really the same thing as a list of $ n$ column vectors of size $ n$. Consequently, the determinant operation may be regarded as a mapping

$\displaystyle \det:\overbrace{K^n\times\ldots\times K^n}^{n \mbox{ times}}\rightarrow K$
The determinant of a matrix $ \mathbf{M}$ is then defined to be $ \det(\mathbf{M}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{M}_n),$ where $ \mathbf{M}_j\in K^n$ denotes the $ j^{\text{th}}$ column of $ \mathbf{M}$.

Starting with the definition

$\displaystyle \det(\mathbf{M}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{M}_n) = \sum_{\pi\in S_n} \mathrm{sgn}(\pi) M_{1\pi_1} M_{2\pi_2}\cdots M_{n\pi_n}$ (1)

the following properties are easily established:
  1. the determinant is multilinear;
  2. the determinant is anti-symmetric;
  3. the determinant of the identity matrix is $ 1$.
These three properties uniquely characterize the determinant, and indeed can -- some would say should -- be used as the definition of the determinant operation.

Let us prove this. We proceed by representing elements of $ K^n$ as linear combinations of

$\displaystyle \mathbf{e}_1=\begin{pmatrix}1\\ 0\\ 0\\ \vdots\\ 0\end{pmatrix},\... ...d \ldots\quad \mathbf{e}_n=\begin{pmatrix}0\\ 0\\ 0\\ \vdots\\ 1\end{pmatrix}, $
the standard basis of $ K^n$. Let $ \mathbf{M}$ be an $ n\times n$ matrix. The $ j^{\text{th}}$ column is represented as $ \sum_i M_{ij}\mathbf{e}_i$; whence using multilinearity
$\displaystyle \det(\mathbf{M})$ $\displaystyle = \det\left(\sum_i M_{i1}\mathbf{e}_i\,,\sum_i M_{i2}\mathbf{e}_i\,,\;\ldots\;,\sum_i M_{in} \mathbf{e}_i\right)$    
  $\displaystyle =\sum_{i_1,\ldots,i_n=1}^n M_{i_11} M_{i_22} \cdots M_{i_n n} \det(\mathbf{e}_{i_1},\mathbf{e}_{i_2},\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{i_n})$    

The anti-symmetry assumption implies that the expressions $ \det(\mathbf{e}_{i_1},\mathbf{e}_{i_2},\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{i_n})$ vanish if any two of the indices $ i_1,\ldots,i_n$ coincide. If all $ n$ indices are distinct,
$\displaystyle \det(\mathbf{e}_{i_1},\mathbf{e}_{i_2},\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{i_n}) = \pm \det(\mathbf{e}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{e}_n),$
the sign in the above expression being determined by the number of transpositions required to rearrange the list $ (i_1,\ldots,i_n)$ into the list $ (1,\ldots,n)$. The sign is therefore the parity of the permutation $ (i_1,\ldots,i_n)$. Since we also assume that
$\displaystyle \det(\mathbf{e}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{e}_n)=1,$
we now recover the original definition (1).



"determinant as a multilinear mapping" is owned by rmilson.
(view preamble)

View style:

See Also: exterior algebra


This object's parent.

Attachments:
basis-free definition of determinant (Definition) by mps
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: permutation, parity, transpositions, number, indices, vanish, expressions, implies, standard basis, linear combinations, identity matrix, anti-symmetric, multilinear, properties, column, mapping, operation, determinant, size, column vectors, field, matrix
There are 2 references to this entry.

This is version 2 of determinant as a multilinear mapping, born on 2002-11-14, modified 2006-01-11.
Object id is 3595, canonical name is DeterminantAsAMultilinearMapping.
Accessed 3298 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC15A15 (Linear and multilinear algebra; matrix theory :: Determinants, permanents, other special matrix functions)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 1 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
basis independance by vitriol on 2002-11-17 15:21:39
a nice way i learnt was to define a volume form to be a map satisfying said properties from U^n -> K and show it's unique upto a constant. then show that the determinant of an endomorphism is well-defined by looking at its action on any basis. I don't know whether this makes things easier or not, any thoughts?
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | prove | add result | add corollary | add example | add (any)