|
Let be a unital ring and a -algebra. Defining “division” requires special considerations when the algebras are non-associative so we introduce the definition in stages.
If is an associative algebra then we say is a division algebra if
- (i)
is unital with identity . So for all ,
- (ii)
- Also every non-zero element of
has an inverse. That is , , then there exists a such that
We denote by and we may prove is unique to .
The standard examples of associative division algebras are fields, which are commutative, and the non-split quaternion algebra:
,
where
and are irreducible over .
For non-associative algebras , the notion of an inverse is not immediate. We use for the product of .
Invertible as endomorphisms: Let . Then define
and
. As the product of is distributive, both an are additive endomorphisms of . If is invertible then we may call “left invertible” and similarly, when is invertible we may call “right invertible” and “invertible” if both and are invertible.
In this model of invertible, is a division algebra if, and only if, for each non-zero , both and invertible. Equivalently: the equations and have unique solutions for nonzero . However, and need not be equal.
A common method to produce non-associative division algebras of this sort is through Schur's Lemma.
Invertible in the product: In some instances, the notion of invertible via endomorphisms is not sufficient. Instead, assume has an identity, that is, an element such that for all ,
Next if , we say is invertible if there exists a such that
 |
(1) |
and furthermore that for all ,
 |
(2) |
Evidently (1) can be inferred from (2). This added assumption substitutes for the need of associativity in the proofs of uniqueness of inverses and in solving equations with non-associative products.
Proposition 1 If is a finite dimensional algebra over a field, then invertible in this sense forces both and to be invertible as well.
In this model, a non-associative algebra is a division algebra if it is unital and every non-zero element is invertible.
The standard examples of non-associative division algebras are actually alternative alegbras, specfically, the composition algebras of fields, non-split quaternions and non-split octonions - only the latter are actually not associative. Invertible in the octonions is interpreted in the second stronger form.
Theorem 2 (Bruck-Klienfeld) Every alternative division algebra is either associative or a non-split octonion.
This result is usually followed by two useful results which serve to omit the need to consider non-associative examples.
Theorem 3 (Artin-Zorn, Wedderburn) A finite alternative division algebra is associative and commutative, so it is a finite field.
|