PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] equivalent definition of a representable functor (Result)

We provide an equivalent, motivating, way of defining a representable functor.

Let $ \mathcal{C}$ be a category and $ F : \mathcal{C} \rightarrow Set$ be a covariant functor and $ A \in \mathcal{C}$. Then the following are equivalent

  1. $ \mathcal{C}(A,-)$ is naturally isomorphic to $ F$ (or, isomorphic in the appropriate category of functors)
  2. There exists an element $ i \in F(A)$ such that for every $ B \in \mathcal{C}, r \in F(B)$ there exists a unique $ f \in \mathcal{C}(A,B)$ such that $ F(f)(i) = r$

To illustrate the significance of this, consider the category $ \mathcal{C} = \bf {Vect}_k$ of vector spaces over a field $ k$. For arbitrary vector spaces $ V, W$ consider the functor $ F : \mathcal{C} \rightarrow Set$ determined by

$\displaystyle F(U) = \operatorname{Bilin}(V \times W, U) $

Where this denotes the set of maps which are linear in both entries. This is a covariant functor in the obvious way. Then one may define $ V \otimes W$ as the object which represents $ F$ (if it exists). The significance of the result is it shows this is equivalent to the 'usual' definition: there is a bilinear map $ i : V \times W \rightarrow V \otimes W$ through which all bilinear maps from $ V \times W$ (these are quantified by r in the theorem) factor uniquely. This is because $ r : V \times W \rightarrow U$ factors through $ i$ exactly when there is an $ f \in \mathcal{C}(V \otimes W, U)$ such that $ F(f)(i) = r$.

Such universal constructions can be shown to be functorial in the basic objects. For instance the tensor product may be shown to be a functor

$\displaystyle {\bf {Vect}_k} \times {\bf {Vect}_k} \rightarrow {\bf {Vect}_k} $

To generalise this suppose that $ \mathcal{D}$ is a category (roughly representing $ {\bf {Vect}_k} \times {\bf {Vect}_k}$ in our case) and we have a functor

$\displaystyle F : \mathcal{D}^{op} \times \mathcal{C} \rightarrow Set $

such that $ F(d,-) : \mathcal{C} \rightarrow Set$ is isomorphic to $ \mathcal{C}(G(d),-)$ for some object $ G(d)$. Then one may show that $ G$ extends to a functor in such a way that $ F(-,-)$ is naturally isomorphic to $ \mathcal{C}(G(-),-)$.

We may show further that if $ F,F^\prime$ are isomorphic functors and $ G,G^\prime$ are functors which represent them respectively, then there is a natural isomorphism between $ G$ and $ G^\prime$.



"equivalent definition of a representable functor" is owned by CWoo. [ full author list (2) | owner history (1) ]
(view preamble)

View style:


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: natural isomorphism, tensor product, universal, factor, bilinear map, represents, object, obvious, maps, field, vector spaces, category of functors, isomorphic, the following are equivalent, covariant functor, category, representable functor, equivalent
There is 1 reference to this entry.

This is version 6 of equivalent definition of a representable functor, born on 2006-03-30, modified 2007-08-03.
Object id is 7788, canonical name is EquivalentDefinitionOfARepresentableFunctor.
Accessed 1036 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC18-00 (Category theory; homological algebra :: General reference works )

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 1 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)