PlanetMath: examples of lamellar field

(more info)

Math for the people, by the people.

Main Menu

sections Encyclopædia
Papers
Books
Expositions

meta Requests (198)
Orphanage
Unclass'd
Unproven (490)
Corrections (7)
Classification

talkback Polls
Forums
Feedback
Bug Reports

downloads Snapshots
PM Book

information News
Docs
Wiki
ChangeLog
TODO List
Legalese
About

examples of lamellar field

(Example)

In the examples that follow, show that the given vector field $\vec{U}$ is lamellar everywhere in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and determine its scalar potential .

Example 1. Given

$\displaystyle \vec{U} \,:=\, y\,\vec{i}+(x+\sin{z})\,\vec{j}+y\cos{z}\,\vec{k}.$

For the rotor (curl) of the field we obtain $\displaystyle\nabla\!\times\!\vec{U} = \left\vert\begin{matrix} \vec{i} & \vec... ...tial(x\!+\!\sin{z})}{\partial{x}}-\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{y}}\right)\vec{k}$ ,
which is identically $\vec{0}$ for all

. Thus, by the definition given in the parent entry, $\vec{U}$ is lamellar.
Since $\nabla{u} = \vec{U}$ , the scalar potential $u = u(x,\,y,\,z)$ must satisfy the conditions

$\displaystyle \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}} = y,\quad \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{y}} = x\!+\!\sin{z},\quad \frac{\partial {u}}{\partial{z}} = y\cos{z}.$

Thus we can write

$\displaystyle u = \int y\,dx = xy+C_1,$

where

may depend on

. Differentiating this result with respect to

and comparing to the second condition, we get

$\displaystyle \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{y}} = x+\frac{\partial{C_1}}{\partial{y}} = x+\sin{z}.$

Accordingly,

$\displaystyle C_1 = \int\sin{z}\,dy = y\sin{z}+C_2,$

where

may depend on

. So

$\displaystyle u = xy+y\sin{z}+C_2.$

Differentiating this result with respect to

and comparing to the third condition yields

$\displaystyle \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{z}} \,=\, y\cos{z}+\frac{\partial{C_2}}{\partial{z}} \,=\, y\cos{z}.$

This means that

is an arbitrary constant. Thus the form

$\displaystyle u = xy+y\sin{z}+C$

expresses the required potential function.

Example 2. This is a particular case in $\mathbb{R}^2$ :

$\displaystyle \vec{U}(x,\,y,\,0) \,:=\, \omega y \,\vec{i}+ \omega x \,\vec{j}, \quad \omega =$ constant

Now, $\displaystyle\nabla\!\times\!\vec{U} = \left\vert\begin{matrix} \vec{i} & \vec... ...a x)}{\partial{x}}-\frac{\partial(\omega y)}{\partial{y}}\right)\vec{k}=\vec{0}$ , and so $\vec{U}$ is lamellar.

Therefore there exists a potential field with $\vec{U}=\nabla{u}$ . We deduce successively:

$\displaystyle \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}} = \omega y; \;\; u(x,y,0) = \omeg... ...tial{u}}{\partial{y}}= \omega x+f'(y)\equiv \omega x; \;\; f'(y)=0; \;\; f(y)=C$

Thus we get the result

$\displaystyle u(x,\,y,\,0) = \omega xy+C,$

which corresponds to a particular case in $\mathbb{R}^2$ .

Example 3. Given

$\displaystyle \vec{U} \,:=\, ax\vec{i}+by\vec{j}-(a+b)z)\vec{k}.$

The rotor is now $\displaystyle\nabla\!\times\!\vec{U} = \left\vert\begin{matrix} \vec{i} & \vec... ...c{\partial}{\partial{z}}\ ax & by & -(a+b)z \end{matrix}\right\vert= \vec{0}.$ From $\nabla u=\vec{U}$ we obtain

$\displaystyle \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = ax \; \implies \; u = \frac{ax^2}{2}+f(y,z) \quad(1)$

$\displaystyle \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = by \; \implies \; u = \frac{by^2}{2}+g(z,x) \quad(2)$

$\displaystyle \frac{\partial u}{\partial z} = -(a+b)z \; \implies \;u = -(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+h(x,y) \quad(3)$

Differentiating (1) and (2) with respect to

and using (3) give

$\displaystyle -(a+b)z = \frac{\partial f(y,z)}{\partial z} \; \implies \; f(y,z) = -(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+F(y) \quad(1');$

$\displaystyle -(a+b)z=\frac{\partial g(z,x)}{\partial z} \; \implies \; g(z,x) = -(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+G(x) \quad (2').$

We substitute

and

again into (1) and (2) and deduce as follows:

$\displaystyle u = \frac{ax^2}{2}-(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+F(y); \;\; \frac{\partial u... ...{by^2}{2}+C_1; \;\; f(y,z) = \frac{by^2}{2}-(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+C_1 \quad (1'');$

$\displaystyle u = \frac{by^2}{2}-(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+G(x); \;\; \frac{\partial u... ...c{ax^2}{2}+C_2; \;\; g(z,x) = \frac{ax^2}{2}-(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+C_2\quad (2'');$

putting

into (1), (2) then gives us

$\displaystyle u = \frac{ax^2}{2}+\frac{by^2}{2}-(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+C_1, \quad u = \frac{ax^2}{2}+\frac{by^2}{2}-(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+C_2,$

whence, by comparing,

, so that by (3), the expression

and

itself have been found, that is,

$\displaystyle u = \frac{ax^2}{2}+\frac{by^2}{2}-(a+b)\frac{z^2}{2}+C.$

Unlike Example 1, the last two examples are also solenoidal, i.e. $\nabla\cdot\vec{U}=0$ , which physically may be interpreted as the continuity equation of an incompressible fluid flow.

Example 4. An additional example of a lamellar field would be

$\displaystyle \vec{U} \,:=\, -\frac{ay}{x^2+y^2}\vec{i}+\frac{ax}{x^2+y^2}\vec{j}+v(z)\vec{k}$

with a differentiable function $v:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ ; if

is a constant, then $\vec{U}$ is also solenoidal.

"examples of lamellar field" is owned by pahio. [ full author list (3) ]

(view preamble)