PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain (Topic)

Let $ R$ be a principal ideal domain and let $ M$ be a finitely generated $ R$- module.

Lemma   Let $ M$ be a submodule of the $ R$-module $ R^n$. Then $ M$ is free and finitely generated by % latex2html id marker 540 $ s\le n$ elements.
Proof. For $ n=1$ this is clear, since $ M$ is an ideal of $ R$ and is generated by some element $ a \in R$. Now suppose that the statement is true for all submodules of % latex2html id marker 553 $ R^m, 1 \le m \le n-1$.

For a submodule $ M$ of $ R^n$ we define % latex2html id marker 559 $ f\colon M\to R$ by $ (k_1, \ldots, k_n) \mapsto k_1$. Since $ f$ is surjective, the image of $ f$ is an ideal % latex2html id marker 567 $ \mathfrak{I}$ in $ R$. If % latex2html id marker 571 $ \mathfrak{I}=\{0\}$, then $ M \subseteq \ker(f)=(0) \times R^{n-1}$. Otherwise, % latex2html id marker 575 $ \mathfrak{I}=(g), g \ne 0$. In the first case, elements of $ \ker(f)$ can be bijectively mapped to $ R^{n-1}$ by the function $ \ker(f) \to R^{n-1}$ given by $ (0, k_1, \ldots, k_{n-1}) \mapsto (k_1,\ldots, k_{n-1})$; so the image of $ M$ under this mapping is a submodule of $ R^{n-1}$, which by the induction hypothesis is finitely generated and free.

Now let $ x \in M$ such that $ f(x) =gh$ and $ y \in M$ with $ f(y)=g$. Then $ f(x-hy)=f(x) -f(hy)=0$, which is equivalent to $ x-hy \in \ker(f) \cap R^n:=N$ which is isomorphic to a submodule of $ R^{n-1}$. This shows that $ Rx+N=M$.

Let $ \{g_1, \ldots, g_s\}$ be a basis of $ N$. By assumption, % latex2html id marker 609 $ s \le n-1$. We'll show that $ \{x, g_1, \ldots, g_s\}$ is linearly independent. So let $ rx +\sum_{i=1}^s r_ig_i=0$. The first component of the $ g_i$ are 0, so the first component of $ rx$ must also be 0. Since $ f(x)$ is a multiple of $ g \ne 0$ and $ 0=r\cdot f(x)$, then $ r=0$. Since $ \{g_1, \ldots, g_s\}$ are linearly independent, $ \{x, g_1, \ldots, g_s\}$ is a generating set of $ M$ with % latex2html id marker 633 $ s+1\le n$ elements. $ \qedsymbol$

Corollary   If $ M$ is a finitely generated $ R$-module over a PID generated by $ s$ elements and $ N$ is a submodule of $ M$, then $ N$ can be generated by $ s$ or fewer elements.
Proof. Let $ \{g_1, \ldots, g_s\}$ be a generating set of $ M$ and % latex2html id marker 660 $ f\colon R^s \to M$, $ (r_1, \ldots, r_s) \mapsto \sum_{i=1}^s r_ig_i$. Then the inverse image $ N^{'}$ of $ N$ is a submodule of $ R^s$, and according to lemma [*] can be generated by $ s$ or fewer elements. Let $ n_1,\ldots, n_t$ be a generating set of $ n^{'}$; then % latex2html id marker 676 $ t \le s$, and since $ f$ is surjective, $ f(n_1), \ldots, f(n_t)$ is a generating set of $ N$. $ \qedsymbol$
Theorem   Let $ M$ be a finitely generated module over a principal ideal domain $ R$.
(I)
Note that $ M/\operatorname{tor}(M)$ is torsion-free, that is, $ \operatorname{tor}(M/\operatorname{tor}(M))=\{0\}$. In particular, if $ M$ is torsion-free, then $ M$ is free.
(II)
Let $ \operatorname{tor}(M)$ be a proper submodule of $ M$. Then there exists a finitely generated free submodule $ F$ of $ M$ such that $ M=F \oplus \operatorname{tor}(M)$.
Proof of (I): Let $ T=\operatorname{tor}(M)$. For $ m\in M$, $ \overline{m}$ denotes the coset modulo $ T$ generated by $ m$. Let $ m$ be a torsion element of $ M/T$, so there exists $ \alpha \in R \setminus \{0\}$ such that $ \alpha\cdot \overline{m}=0$, which means $ \alpha\cdot \overline{m} \subseteq T$. But then $ \alpha \cdot m$ is a member of $ T$, and this implies that $ M/T$ has no non-zero torsion elements (which is obvious if $ M=\operatorname{tor}(M)$).

Now let $ N$ be a finitely generated torsion-free $ R$-module with generating set $ \{g_1, \ldots, g_n\}$. The homomorphism % latex2html id marker 746 $ f\colon R^n \to N$ defined by $ (r_1, \ldots, r_n) \mapsto \sum_{i=1}^n r_ig_i$ is injective since $ N$ is torsion-free. Let $ \{e_1, \ldots, e_n\}$ be the standard basis of $ R^n$. Then the elements $ f(e_1),\ldots, f(e_n)$ are linearly independent in $ N$. Now let $ N=M/\operatorname{tor}(M)$ where $ \operatorname{tor}(M)=\{0\}$. Then the cosets can be identified with the elements of $ M$, and the statement follows.

Proof of (II): Let % latex2html id marker 766 $ \pi\colon M \to M/T$ be defined by $ a \mapsto a +T$. Then $ \pi$ is surjective, so $ m_1, \ldots, m_t \in M$ can be chosen such that $ \pi(m_i)=n_i$, where the $ n_i$'s are a basis of $ M/T$. If $ 0_M=\sum_{i=1}^t a_im_i$, then $ 0_n=\sum_{i=1}^t a_in_i$. Since $ n_1,\ldots,n_t$ are linearly independent in $ N$ it follows $ 0=a_1=\ldots =a_t$. So the submodule spanned by $ m_1,\ldots,m_t$ of $ M$ is free.

Now let $ m$ be some element of $ M$ and $ \pi(m)=\sum_{i=1}^t a_in_i$. This is equivalent to % latex2html id marker 800 $ m-\left(\sum_{i=1}^t a_in_i\right) \in \ker(\pi)=T$. Hence, any $ m\in M$ is a sum of the form $ f+t$, for some $ f \in F$ and $ t \in T$. Since $ F$ is torsion-free, $ F \cap T=\{0\}$, and it follows that $ M=F \oplus T$.



"finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain" is owned by yark. [ full author list (2) | owner history (1) ]
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: sum, spanned by, standard basis, injective, implies, torsion element, coset, proof, torsion-free, finitely generated module, inverse image, multiple, component, linearly independent, basis, isomorphic, equivalent, induction hypothesis, mapping, function, image, surjective, ideal, clear, submodule, module, finitely generated, principal ideal domain
There is 1 reference to this entry.

This is version 14 of finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain, born on 2003-09-01, modified 2008-09-11.
Object id is 4680, canonical name is FinitelyGeneratedModulesOverAPrincipalIdealDomain.
Accessed 3529 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC13E15 (Commutative rings and algebras :: Chain conditions, finiteness conditions :: Rings and modules of finite generation or presentation; number of generators)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 7 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Addendum by ramanujan on 2004-01-01 04:21:35
The statement could be made more precise in the following manner:

If M is a finitely generated module over a PID R, then

M \cong R^n \oplus R/(q_1) \oplus ... \oplus R/(q_r)

where q_1 | q_1 | ... q_r, the ideals (q_i) are uniquely determined.

Here, R^n is the free module F which is the torsion free part of M. Therefore, n is uniquely determined too. The other factors represent a direct sum decomposition of M_{tor} (the torsion submodule of M).



[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)