PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] Galois-theoretic derivation of the quartic formula (Proof)

Let $x^4 + ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$ be a general polynomial with four roots $r_1,r_2,r_3,r_4$ , so $(x-r_1)(x-r_2)(x-r_3)(x-r_4) = x^4 + ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$ . The goal is to exhibit the field extension $\C(r_1,r_2,r_3,r_4)/\C(a,b,c,d)$ as a radical extension, thereby expressing $r_1,r_2,r_3,r_4$ in terms of $a,b,c,d$ by radicals.

Write $N$ for $\C(r_1,r_2,r_3,r_4)$ and $F$ for $\C(a,b,c,d)$ . The Galois group $\Gal(N/F)$ is the symmetric group $S_4$ , the permutation group on the four elements $\{r_1,r_2,r_3,r_4\}$ , which has a composition series

$\displaystyle 1 \lhd \mathbb{Z}/2 \lhd V_4 \lhd A_4 \lhd S_4, $
where:

Under the Galois correspondence, each of these subgroups corresponds to an intermediate field of the extension $N/F$ . We denote these fixed fields by (in increasing order) $K$ , $L$ , and $M$ .

We thus have a tower of field extensions, and corresponding automorphism groups:

$\displaystyle \xymatrix{ \text{Subgroup} & \text{Fixed field} \ 1 & N \ar@{-}... ...{Z}/2 & M \ar@{-}[d] \ V & L \ar@{-}[d] \ A_4 & K \ar@{-}[d] \ S_4 & F } $

By Galois theory, or Kummer theory, each field in this diagram is a radical extension of the one below it, and our job is done if we explicitly find what the radical extension is in each case.

We start with $K/F$ . The index of $A_4$ in $S_4$ is two, so $K/F$ is a degree two extension. We have to find an element of $K$ that is not in $F$ . The easiest such element to take is the element $\Delta$ obtained by taking the products of the differences of the roots, namely, $$ \Delta := \prod_{1 \leq i < j \leq 4} (r_i - r_j) = (r_1-r_2) (r_1-r_3) (r_1-r_4) (r_2-r_3) (r_2-r_4) (r_3-r_4). $$ Observe that $\Delta$ is fixed by any even permutation of the roots $r_i$ , but that $\sigma(\Delta) = -\Delta$ for any odd permutation $\sigma$ . Accordingly, $\Delta^2$ is actually fixed by all of $S_4$ , so:

  • $\Delta \in K$ , but $\Delta \notin F$ .
  • $\Delta^2 \in F$ .
  • $K = F[\Delta]$ = $F[\sqrt{\Delta^2}]$ , thus exhibiting $K/F$ as a radical extension.

The element $\Delta^2 \in F$ is called the discriminant of the polynomial. An explicit formula for $\Delta^2$ can be found using the reduction algorithm for symmetric polynomials, and, although it is not needed for our purposes, we list it here for reference: \begin{eqnarray*} \Delta^2 & = & 256 d^3 - d^2 (27 a^4 - 144 a^2 b + 128 b^2 + 192 a c) - \\ & & c^2 (27c^2 - 18 abc + 4a^3 c + 4 b^3 - a^2 b^2) - \\ & & 2d (abc (9a^2 - 40 b) - 2b^3 (a^2-4b) - 3c^2 (a^2-24b)). \end{eqnarray*} Next up is the extension $L/K$ , which has degree 3 since $[A_4:V_4]=3$ . We have to find an element of $N$ which is fixed by $V_4$ but not by $A_4$ . Luckily, the form of $V_4$ almost cries out that the following elements be used: \begin{eqnarray*} t_1 & := & (r_1+r_2)(r_3+r_4) \\ t_2 & := & (r_1+r_3)(r_2+r_4) \\ t_3 & := & (r_1+r_4)(r_2+r_3) \end{eqnarray*} These three elements of $N$ are fixed by everything in $V_4$ , but not by everything in $A_4$ . They are therefore elements of $L$ that are not in $K$ . Moreover, every permutation in $S_4$ permutes the set $\{t_1, t_2, t_3\}$ , so the cubic polynomial $$ \Phi(x) := (x-t_1) (x-t_2) (x-t_3) $$ actually has coefficients in $F$ ! In fancier language, the cubic polynomial $\Phi(x)$ defines a cubic extension $E$ of $F$ which is linearly disjoint from $K$ , with the composite extension $EK$ equal to $L$ . The polynomial $\Phi(x)$ is called the resolvent cubic of the quartic polynomial $x^4 + ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$ . The coefficients of $\Phi(x)$ can be found fairly easily using (again) the reduction algorithm for symmetric polynomials, which yields \begin{equation}\label{resolvent} \Phi(x) = x^3 - 2b x^2 + (b^2+ac-4d) x + (c^2+a^2d - abc). \end{equation}Using the cubic formula, one can find radical expressions for the three roots of this polynomial, which are $t_1$ , $t_2$ , and $t_3$ , and henceforth we assume radical expressions for these three quantities are known. We also have $L = K[t_1]$ , which in light of what we just said, exhibits $L/K$ as an explicit radical extension.

The remaining extensions are easier and the reader who has followed to this point should have no trouble with the rest. For the degree two extension $M/L$ , we require an element of $M$ that is not in $L$ ; one convenient such element is $r_1+r_2$ , which is a root of the quadratic polynomial \begin{equation}\label{step} (x-(r_1+r_2)) (x-(r_3+r_4)) = x^2 + a x + t_1 \in L[x] \end{equation}and therefore equals $(-a + \sqrt{a^2 - 4 t_1})/2$ . Hence $M = L[r_1+r_2] = L[(-a + \sqrt{a^2 - 4 t_1})/2]$ is a radical extension of $L$ .

Finally, for the extension $N/M$ , an element of $N$ that is not in $M$ is of course $r_1$ , which is a root of the quadratic polynomial \begin{equation}\label{final} (x-r_1)(x-r_2) = x^2 - (r_1+r_2) x + r_1 r_2. \end{equation}Now, $r_1+r_2$ is known from the previous paragraph, so it remains to find an expression for $r_1 r_2$ . Note that $r_1 r_2$ is fixed by $(12)(34)$ , so it is in $M$ but not in $L$ . To find it, use the equation $(t_2 + t_3 - t_1)/2 = r_1 r_2 + r_3 r_4$ , which gives $$ (x - r_1 r_2) (x - r_3 r_4) = x^2 - \frac{(t_2 + t_3 - t_1)}{2} x + d $$ and, upon solving for $r_1 r_2$ with the quadratic formula, yields \begin{eqnarray} \label{post} r_1 r_2 & = & \frac{(t_2 + t_3 - t_1) + \sqrt{(t_2 + t_3 - t_1)^2 - 16d}}{4} \\ \label{post2} r_3 r_4 & = & \frac{(t_2 + t_3 - t_1) - \sqrt{(t_2 + t_3 - t_1)^2 - 16d}}{4} \end{eqnarray}We can then use this expression, combined with Equation ([*]), to solve for $r_1$ using the quadratic formula. Perhaps, at this point, our poor reader needs a summary of the procedure, so we give one here:

  1. Find $t_1$ , $t_2$ , and $t_3$ by solving the resolvent cubic (Equation ([*])) using the cubic formula,
  2. From Equation ([*]), obtain \begin{eqnarray*} r_1+r_2 & = & \frac{(-a + \sqrt{a^2 - 4 t_1})}{2} \\ r_3+r_4 & = & \frac{(-a - \sqrt{a^2 - 4 t_1})}{2} \end{eqnarray*}
  3. Using Equation ([*]), write \begin{eqnarray*} r_1 & = & \frac{(r_1+r_2) + \sqrt{(r_1+r_2)^2 - 4 (r_1 r_2)}}{2} \\ r_2 & = & \frac{(r_1+r_2) - \sqrt{(r_1+r_2)^2 - 4 (r_1 r_2)}}{2} \\ r_3 & = & \frac{(r_3+r_4) + \sqrt{(r_3+r_4)^2 - 4 (r_3 r_4)}}{2} \\ r_4 & = & \frac{(r_3+r_4) - \sqrt{(r_3+r_4)^2 - 4 (r_3 r_4)}}{2} \\ \end{eqnarray*}where the expressions $r_1+r_2$ and $r_3+r_4$ are derived in the previous step, and the expressions $r_1 r_2$ and $r_3 r_4$ come from Equation ([*]) and ([*]).
  4. Now the roots $r_1,r_2,r_3,r_4$ of the quartic polynomial $x^4 + ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d$ have been found, and we are done!




"Galois-theoretic derivation of the quartic formula" is owned by djao.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: Galois-theoretic derivation of the cubic formula

Also defines:  resolvent cubic

This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: quadratic formula, equation, expression, point, radical expressions, cubic formula, composite extension, linearly disjoint, language, coefficients, permutation, reference, reduction algorithm for symmetric polynomials, formula, discriminant, odd permutation, fixed, differences, products, degree, index, diagram, Kummer theory, automorphism groups, order, increasing, fixed fields, extension, field, Galois correspondence, subgroup, Klein four-group, even permutations, alternating group, composition series, elements, permutation group, symmetric group, Galois group, radicals, terms, radical extension, field extension, roots, polynomial
There are 4 references to this entry.

This is version 6 of Galois-theoretic derivation of the quartic formula, born on 2002-04-10, modified 2003-09-15.
Object id is 2825, canonical name is GaloisTheoreticDerivationOfTheQuarticFormula.
Accessed 26172 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC12D10 (Field theory and polynomials :: Real and complex fields :: Polynomials: location of zeros )

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 3 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Inconsistent results by clux on 2006-02-12 14:18:40
I've been trying to write a program that does this automatically for my calculator, but have encountered a problem. Which root I choose from the resolvent cubic to be root 1 (t1) affects the result, and it's a different root that's needed for some equations than in others.

I solve the resolvent using the equations from "galois theoretic derivation of the cubic equation", so my t1 is r1 from that page, t2 = r2 etc.

Is there any way to know which root yields the correct result?
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)