PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] homomorphism between partial algebras (Definition)

Definition

Like subalgebras of partial algebras, there are also three ways to define homomorphisms between partial algebras. Similar to the definition of homomorphisms between algebras, a homomorphism $\phi: \boldsymbol{A}\to \boldsymbol{B}$ between two partial algebras of type $\tau$ is a function from $A$ to $B$ that satisfies the equation \begin{equation} \phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n))= f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots, \phi(a_n)) \end{equation}for every $n$ -ary function symbol $f\in \tau$ . However, because $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}$ and $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}$ are not everywhere defined in their respective domains, care must be taken as to what the equation means.

  1. $\phi$ is a homomorphism if, given that $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n)$ is defined, so is $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots, \phi(a_n))$ , and equation (1) is satisifed.
  2. $\phi$ is a full homomorphism if it is a homomorphism and, given that $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ is defined and in $\phi(A)$ , for $b_i\in \phi(A)$ , there exist $a_i\in A$ with $b_i=\phi(a_i)$ , such that $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n)$ is defined.
  3. $\phi$ is a strong homomorphism if it is a homomorphism and, given that $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots, \phi(a_n))$ is defined, so is $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n)$ .

We have the following implications:

strong homomorphism $\rightarrow$ full homomorphism $\rightarrow$ homomorphism.
For example, field homomorphisms are strong homomorphisms.

Homomorphisms preserve constants: for each constant symbol $f$ in $\tau$ , $\phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}) = f_{\boldsymbol{B}}$ . In fact, when restricted to constants, $\phi$ is a bijection between constants of $\boldsymbol{A}$ and constants of $\boldsymbol{B}$ .

When $\boldsymbol{A}$ is an algebra (all partial operations are total), a homomorphism from $\boldsymbol{A}$ is always strong, so that all three notions of homomorphisms coincide.

An isomorphism is a bijective homomorphism $\phi: \boldsymbol{A}\to \boldsymbol{B}$ such that its inverse $\phi^{-1}: \boldsymbol{B}\to \boldsymbol{A}$ is also a homomorphism. An embedding is an injective homomorphism. Isomorphisms and full embeddings are strong.

Homomorphic Images

The various types of homomorphisms and the various types of subalgebras are related. Suppose $\boldsymbol{A}$ and $\boldsymbol{B}$ are partial algebras of type $\tau$ . Let $\phi:A\to B$ be a function, and $C=\phi(A)$ . For each $n$ -ary function symbol $f\in \tau$ , define $n$ -ary partial operation $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}$ on $C$ as follows:

for $b_1,\ldots, b_n\in C$ , $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ is defined iff the set $$D:=\lbrace (a_1,\ldots, a_n)\in A^n \mid \phi(a_i)=b_i\rbrace \cap \operatorname{dom}(f_{\boldsymbol{A}})$$ is non-empty, where $\operatorname{dom}(f_{\boldsymbol{A}})$ is the domain of definition of $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}$ , and when this is the case, $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n):=\phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n))$ , for some $(a_1,\ldots, a_n)\in D$ .
If $\phi$ preserves constants (if any), and $f_C$ is non-empty for each $f\in \tau$ then $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a partial algebra of type $\tau$ .

Fix an arbitrary $n$ -ary symbol $f\in \tau$ . The following are the basic properties of $\boldsymbol{C}$ :

Proposition 1   $\phi$ is a homomorphism iff $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a weak subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ .
Proof. Suppose first that $\phi$ is a homomorphism. If $n=0$ , then $f_{\boldsymbol{A}} \in A$ , and $f_{\boldsymbol{B}} = \phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}) \in C$ . If $n>0$ , then for some $a_1,\ldots, a_n\in A$ , $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$ is defined, and consequently $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1), \ldots, \phi(a_n))$ is defined, and is equal to $\phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1, \ldots, a_n)) \in C$ . By the definition for $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}$ above, $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}(\phi(a_1), \ldots, \phi(a_n)):=\phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1, \ldots, a_n))$ . This shows that $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a $\tau$ -algebra.

To furthermore show that $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a weak subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ , assume $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ is defined. Then there are $a_1,\ldots, a_n\in A$ with $b_i=\phi(a_i)$ such that $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n)$ is defined. Since $\phi$ is a homomorphism, $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots,\phi(a_n))$ , and hence $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ , is defined. Furthermore, $f_C(b_1,\ldots, b_n)=\phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n))=f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots,\phi(a_n))=f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ . This shows that $\boldsymbol{C}$ is weak.

On the other hand, suppose now that $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a weak subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ . Suppose $a_1,\ldots, a_n\in A$ and $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n)$ is defined. Let $b_i=\phi(a_i)\in C$ . Then, by the definition of $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}$ , $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ is defined and is equal to $\phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n))$ . Since $\boldsymbol{C}$ is weak, $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ is defined and is equal to $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ . As a result, $\phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n))=f_{\boldsymbol{C}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)=f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)= f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots, \phi(a_n))$ . Hence $\phi$ is a homomorphism. $ \qedsymbol$

Proposition 2   $\phi$ is a full homomorphism iff $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a relative subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ .
Proof. Suppose first that $\phi$ is full. Since $\phi$ is a homomorphism, $\boldsymbol{C}$ is weak. Suppose $b_1,\ldots, b_n\in C$ such that $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ is defined and is in $C$ . Since $\phi$ is full, there are $a_i\in A$ such that $b_i = \phi(a_i)$ and $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n)$ is defined, and $\phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots,a_n))=f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots, \phi(a_n))=f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ , so that $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots,b_n)$ is defined and thus $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a relative subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ .

Conversely, suppose that $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a relative subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ . Then $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a weak subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ and $\phi$ is a homomorphism. To show that $\phi$ is full, suppose that $b_i\in C$ such that $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ is defined in $C$ . Then $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ is defined in $C$ and is equal to $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ . This means that there are $a_i\in A$ such that $b_i=\phi(a_i)$ , and $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n)$ is defined, showing that $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}$ is full. $ \qedsymbol$

Proposition 3   $\phi$ is a strong homomorphism iff $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ .
Proof. Suppose first that $\phi$ is strong. Since $\phi$ is full, $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a relative subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ . Suppose now that for $b_i\in C$ , $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)$ is defined. Since $b_i=\phi(a_i)$ for some $a_i \in A$ , and since $\phi$ is strong, $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n)$ is defined. This means that $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(b_1,\ldots, b_n)= f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots, \phi(a_n))=\phi(f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n))$ , which is in $C$ . So $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ .

Going the other direction, suppose now that $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ . Since $\boldsymbol{C}$ is a relative subalgebra of $\boldsymbol{B}$ , $\phi$ is full. To show that $\phi$ is strong, suppose $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots, \phi(a_n))$ is defined. Then $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots, \phi(a_n))$ is defined and is equal to $f_{\boldsymbol{B}}(\phi(a_1),\ldots, \phi(a_n))$ . By definition of $f_{\boldsymbol{C}}$ , $f_{\boldsymbol{A}}(a_1,\ldots, a_n)$ is therefore defined. So $\phi$ is strong. $ \qedsymbol$

Definition. Let $\boldsymbol{A}$ and $\boldsymbol{B}$ be partial algebras of type $\tau$ . If $\phi:\boldsymbol{A}\to \boldsymbol{B}$ is a homomorphism, then $\boldsymbol{C}$ , as defined above, is a partial algebra of type $\tau$ , and is called the homomorphic image of $A$ via $\phi$ , and is sometimes written $\phi(\boldsymbol{A})$ .

Bibliography

1
G. Grätzer: Universal Algebra, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York (1978).




"homomorphism between partial algebras" is owned by CWoo.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

Also defines:  homomorphism, full homomorphism, strong homomorphism, isomorphism, strong, homomorphic image, embedding

This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: conversely, relative subalgebra, weak subalgebra, properties, fix, domain of definition, iff, inverse, bijective, partial operations, bijection, restricted, constant symbol, preserve, field homomorphisms, implications, domains, function symbol, equation, satisfies, function, type, algebras, similar, partial algebras, subalgebras
There are 83 references to this entry.

This is version 10 of homomorphism between partial algebras, born on 2009-01-10, modified 2009-01-14.
Object id is 11482, canonical name is HomomorphismBetweenPartialAlgebras.
Accessed 1586 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC08A62 (General algebraic systems :: Algebraic structures :: Finitary algebras)
 03E99 (Mathematical logic and foundations :: Set theory :: Miscellaneous)
 08A55 (General algebraic systems :: Algebraic structures :: Partial algebras)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)