PlanetMath: ideal class group is finite

(more info)

Math for the people, by the people.

Main Menu

sections Encyclopædia
Papers
Books
Expositions

meta Requests (200)
Orphanage
Unclass'd
Unproven (490)
Corrections (6)
Classification

talkback Polls
Forums
Feedback
Bug Reports

downloads Snapshots
PM Book

information News
Docs
Wiki
ChangeLog
TODO List
Legalese
About

Entry average rating: No information on entry rating

ideal class group is finite

(Theorem)

We give two proofs of the finiteness of the class group, one using Minkowski's theorem and a second, more elementary, proof that does not provide the same computational benefits as Minkowski's bound does. Both proofs rely on the following lemma:

Lemma 1 If is an algebraic extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ and $0<d\in\mathbb{Z}$ , then there are only a finite number of ideals of norm .

Proof.
The norm of a prime ideal $\mathfrak{P}$ of

lying over a rational prime

, where

is the residue field degree $[\mathcal{O}_K/\mathfrak{P}\mathcal{O}_K:\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}]$ , and there are at most $[K:\mathbb{Q}]$ prime ideals lying over any given rational prime. There are thus only a finite number of possibilities for ideals with norm

- simply factor

into a product of prime powers and note that each prime power must correspond to one of a finite number of possibilities.

The finiteness of the class group now follows trivially from Minkowski's theorem:

Theorem 1 If is an algebraic extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ , then the class group of , denoted ${\mathrm{Cl}}(K)$ , is finite.

Proof.
Minkowski's theorem guarantees that each ideal class contains a representative integral ideal whose norm is bounded by a constant depending only on the field, and the lemma shows that there are only a finite number of integral ideals with norm less than that constant.

Minkowski's theorem gives enough information about the size of the class group to be computationally useful in some cases (see the topic on using Minkowski's constant to find a class number). It does, however, require quite a bit of machinery. To see in a more elementary way that ${\mathrm{Cl}}(K)$ is finite, one can proceed as follows:

Proof. (alternate proof of theorem)
By the lemma, it suffices to show that there is some constant , depending only on , such that every class in ${\mathrm{Cl}}(K)$ has a representative $I\subset\mathcal{O}_K$ with ${\mathrm{N}}(I)\leq C$ . For $u\in K$ , denote by the linear map left multiplication by , and let $e_1,\ldots,e_n$ be a basis of $\mathcal{O}_K$ as a $\mathbb{Z}$ -module (where $[K:\mathbb{Q}]=n$ ). Then if $u=\sum b_i(u)e_i$ , it follows that

$\displaystyle {\mathrm{N}}(u) = \det(T_u)=\det\left(\sum b_i(u)T_{e_i}\right)$

is a polynomial of total degree at most

in the

, whose coefficients are functions of the $T_{e_i}$ and thus depend only on

(and not on

). Let

be the sum of the magnitude of those coefficients.

Let be a class in ${\mathrm{Cl}}(K)$ and let $J\subset \mathcal{O}_K$ be a representative of the class $c^{-1}$ . Consider $S=\{\sum_{i=1}^n r_ie_i\ \mid\ 1\leq r_i\leq \lfloor {\mathrm{N}}(J)^{1/n}+1\rfloor\}$ . The cardinality of is strictly greater than ${\mathrm{N}}(J)$ , while $\lvert\mathcal{O}_K/J\rvert={\mathrm{N}}(J)$ . So by the pigenhole principle, two distinct elements of are in the same -coset of $\mathcal{O}_K$ . Taking their difference, we get an element $0\neq x=\sum b_i(x)e_i\in J$ , where not all the are zero, and $\lvert b_i(x)\rvert \leq {\mathrm{N}}(J)^{1/n}$ .

Now, since $x\in J$ , using unique factorization of ideals in the Dedekind ring $\mathcal{O}_K$ , we can construct an integral ideal such that , so that is in the class $c\in{\mathrm{Cl}}(K)$ . Finally,