PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
topological embedding (Definition)

Let $ X$, $ Y$ be topological spaces. A map $ f:X\to Y$ is said to be an embedding (or imbedding) if the restriction $ f:X\to f[X]$ is homeomorphism.

The notation $ f:X\hookrightarrow Y$ is often used for embeddings.

The embeddings correspond to the subspaces. Observe that $ f$ and the inclusion map of the subspace $ f[X]$ into $ X$ differ only up to a homeomorphism.

Bibliography

1
Wikipedia's entry on Embedding
2
S. Willard, General topology, Addison-Wesley, Massachussets, 1970.



Anyone with an account can edit this entry. Please help improve it!

"topological embedding" is owned by kompik. [ full author list (4) ]
(view preamble)

View style:

See Also: subspace topology

Other names:  imbedding
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: inclusion map, subspaces, homeomorphism, restriction, embedding, map, topological spaces
There are 5 references to this entry.

This is version 5 of topological embedding, born on 2005-09-24, modified 2007-04-16.
Object id is 7385, canonical name is Embedding4.
Accessed 2871 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC54C25 (General topology :: Maps and general types of spaces defined by maps :: Embedding)
 52B05 (Convex and discrete geometry :: Polytopes and polyhedra :: Combinatorial properties )

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Tensor products by rm50 on 2005-09-30 17:38:22
Suppose R is a DVR with field of fractions K; L is a finite separable extension of K, S is the integral closure of R in L. Suppose further that S = R[u]. Let R_hat be the completion of R with respect to its prime.

Why is R_hat[u] = S tensor-over-R R_hat? There is an obvious map
u -> u tensor 1 that extends to a map of rings; is it in fact obvious that this is an isomorphism of rings?
[ reply | up ]
bi-directional updating by rspuzio on 2005-09-27 19:20:26
I see that there are a whole bunch of entries showing up nowadays that are based on Wikipedia entries. This is fine, but it suggests that it might be time to reconsider the business of bi-directional updating. Rather than copying entries one-by-one on an ad hoc basis, it might be less work in the long run to work out a scheme which will do this automatically, or at least partially utomatically.
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)