PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: Very high
[parent] inclusion mapping (Definition)

Definition Let $X$ be a subset of $Y$ . Then the inclusion map from $X$ to $Y$ is the mapping \begin{eqnarray*} \iota: X&\to& Y \\ x&\mapsto& x. \end{eqnarray*} In other words, the inclusion map is simply a fancy way to say that every element in $X$ is also an element in $Y$ .

To indicate that a mapping is an inclusion mapping, one usually writes $\hookrightarrow$ instead of $\to$ when defining or mentioning an inclusion map. This hooked arrow symbol $\hookrightarrow$ can be seen as combination of the symbols $\subset$ and $\to$ . In the above definition, we have not used this convention. However, examples of this convention would be:

  • Let $\iota:X\hookrightarrow Y$ be the inclusion map from $X$ to $Y$ .
  • We have the inclusion $S^n\hookrightarrow \sR^{n+1}$ .




"inclusion mapping" is owned by Koro. [ owner history (1) ]
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: pullback

Other names:  inclusion map, inclusion

This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: arrow, mapping, subset
There are 191 references to this entry.

This is version 6 of inclusion mapping, born on 2003-06-26, modified 2004-01-31.
Object id is 4402, canonical name is InclusionMapping.
Accessed 12406 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC03E20 (Mathematical logic and foundations :: Set theory :: Other classical set theory )

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 1 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
inclusion map on Riemannian manifolds by ulrich_utiger on 2006-04-12 13:52:45
My professor is pretending that the inclusion map i:M C Rn takes the points of definition (x1,...,xm) of a parametrization x:U -> M (where M C Rn is a manifold of dimension m and U an open set of Rm) to Rn in the following sense: if m<n and p=x(q) is a point of M then i(p)=(x1,...,xm,0,...,0) is a point of Rn. This definition gives no sense to me. But I dont dare asking him again about this. Can anyone explain the sense of this definition and how it is compatible with the definition on this site?
[ reply | up ]
Why is inclusion map a topological embedding? by zhaoway on 2003-11-23 09:32:47
I read in John M. Lee's book: Introduction to topological manifolds, proposition 3.4 (a) says that inclusion map is a topological embedding. But let's suppose there is an inclusion map from a closed subset A of X to X, then in the subspace of A inherited from X, A itself is an open set, while its image after the inclusion map is a closed subset in X. Henceforthly, this inclusion map between A and its image is not a homeomorphism. Hence no topological embedding. Where have I gone wrong? Please! Thank you!
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)