PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
structure (Definition)

Let $\tau$ be a signature. A $\tau$ structure $\mathcal{A}$ comprises of a set $A$ called the universe (or domain) of $\mathcal{A}$ and an interpretation of the symbols of $\tau$ as follows:

If $\mathcal{A}$ is a structure, then the cardinality (or power) of $\mathcal{A}$ $|\mathcal{A}|$ is the cardinality of its universe $A$




"structure" is owned by CWoo. [ full author list (3) | owner history (3) ]
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: relational structure

Also defines:  structure, interpretation

Attachments:
relational structure (Derivation) by CWoo
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: power, cardinality, subset, relation symbol, function, function symbol, constant symbol, signature
There are 384 references to this entry.

This is version 15 of structure, born on 2002-06-03, modified 2007-11-16.
Object id is 3017, canonical name is StructuresAndSatisfaction.
Accessed 24345 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC03C07 (Mathematical logic and foundations :: Model theory :: Basic properties of first-order languages and structures)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 4 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
another question by rmilson on 2002-06-03 20:03:09
In regards to your structures entry, here is a
question that has been bothering me for a good long while:

Are empty models/structures allowed?

Of course, all foralls are true in an empty model,
and all "there exists" false.

Usually the standard texts say "no empty models allowed"
and I always wondered: "how come?"

The closest I've been able to come to an explanation,
is that people seem to want to be able to deduce
that

(For all x) (Px) |- (Exists x)(Px)

and to do this, you need to forbid empty models.

This always struck me as a question of convention,
an arbitrary decision someone made long ago.

Am I missing something? What is so abhorrent about
empty models that they must be forbidden?
[ reply | up ]
nomenclature by rmilson on 2002-06-03 19:56:19
"Structures" or "models" that is the question.

I am no logician, but in every encounter I have had
with logic, this concept was named a "model".
Witness the fact that "model" theory is an established branch of
mathematical logic.

So my question is: where is your "structure" terminology
coming from. Is this a personal preference, or
is there a pattern of widespread usage to back up
your choice of words?

[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)