PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
${\mathbb{Z}}_n$ (Definition)

Let $ n \in \mathbb{Z}$. An equivalence relation, called congruence, can be defined on $ \mathbb{Z}$ by $ a \equiv b \operatorname{mod} n$ iff $ n$ divides $ b-a$. Note first of all that $ a \equiv b \operatorname{mod} n$ iff $ a \equiv b \operatorname{mod} \vert n\vert$. Thus, without loss of generality, only nonnegative $ n$ need be considered. Secondly, note that the case $ n=0$ is not very interesting. If $ a \equiv b \operatorname{mod} 0$, then 0 divides $ b-a$, which occurs exactly when $ a=b$. In this case, the set of all equivalence classes can be identified with $ \mathbb{Z}$. Thus, only positive $ n$ need be considered. The set of all equivalence classes of $ \mathbb{Z}$ under the given equivalence relation is called $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$.

Some mathematicians consider the notation $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ to be archaic and somewhat confusing. This matter of notation is most considerable when $ n=p$ for some prime $ p$, as $ {\mathbb{Z}}_p$ is used to refer to the $ p$-adic integers. To avoid this confusion, some mathematicians use the notation $ \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ instead of $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$. On the other hand, the notation $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ should not cause confusion when $ n$ is not prime, and is an intuitive shorthand way to write $ \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$. Thus, others use $ {\mathbb{F}}_p$ when $ n=p$ for some prime $ p$ and $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ otherwise. (The explanation of the usage of $ \mathbb{F}_p$ will come later.) Still others, especially those who are unfamiliar with the $ p$-adic integers, use the notation $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ exclusively. (In this entry, the notation $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ is used exclusively, though it is highly recommended to use another notation when $ n=p$ for some prime $ p$.)

One usually identifies an element of $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ (which is technically a class, not a number) with the unique element in the class $ r$ such that $ 0 \le r < n$. One can use the division algorithm to establish that, for each class, an $ r$ as described exists uniquely. (The set of all $ r$'s as described is an example of a residue system.) Thus, the sets $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ are finite with exactly $ n$ elements. Addition and multiplication operations can also be defined on $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ in a natural way that corresponds to the operations on $ \mathbb{Z}$. Under these operations, $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ is a commutative ring with identity as well as a cyclic ring with behavior $ 1$. When $ n=p$ for some prime $ p$, $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ is a field. In this case, the notation $ {\mathbb{F}}_p$ highlights the fact that the structure is a field. When $ n$ is composite, $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ has zero divisors and thus is neither a field nor an integral domain. Also note that $ {\mathbb{Z}}_1$ is a zero ring, since all integers are equivalent, yielding only one equivalence class.

The $ n$ in both $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ and $ a \equiv b \operatorname{mod} n$ is called the modulus. Performing computations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and taking exponents in one of the rings $ {\mathbb{Z}}_n$ is called modular arithmetic.



"${\mathbb{Z}}_n$" is owned by Wkbj79.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: residue systems, $\mathbb{Z}$, cyclic rings that are isomorphic to $k{\mathbb{Z}}_{kn}$, congruence, equivalence relation

Other names:  integers mod n
Also defines:  modulus, modular arithmetic

Attachments:
multiplicative order of an integer modulo m (Definition) by alozano
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: rings, subtraction, integers, zero ring, integral domain, zero divisors, composite, field, behavior, cyclic ring, commutative ring, operations, multiplication, addition, finite, residue system, division algorithm, not a number, positive, equivalence classes, without loss of generality, divides, iff, equivalence relation
There are 13 references to this entry.

This is version 21 of ${\mathbb{Z}}_n$, born on 2006-06-09, modified 2008-02-22.
Object id is 7985, canonical name is MathbbZ_n.
Accessed 5551 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC11-00 (Number theory :: General reference works )
 13M05 (Commutative rings and algebras :: Finite commutative rings :: Structure)
 13-00 (Commutative rings and algebras :: General reference works )

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 2 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Congruences on Markov numbers by CompositeFan on 2007-07-21 16:35:28
PrimeFan, I'll transfer MarkovNumber to you. I can't access Acta Arithmetica PDFs from where I'm at right now, so I trust that you have read it and will make the appropriate additions.
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)