PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: Very high
ultra-complex systems (Topic)

Ultra-complex systems

An ultra-complex system represents the human mind from the standpoint of a generalized Categorical Ontology Theory of Levels as the highest level of complexity that emerged through biological and social coevolution over the last $2.2$ million years on Earth.

Preliminary Data:

One can represent in square categorical diagrams the emergence of ultra-complex dynamics from the super-complex dynamics of human organisms coupled via social interactions in characteristic patterns represented by Rosetta biogroupoids, together with the complex-albeit inanimate-systems with `chaos'. With the emergence of the ultra-complex system of the human mind- based on the super-complex human organism- there is always an associated progression towards higher dimensional algebras from the lower dimensions of human neural network dynamics and the simple algebra of physical dynamics, as shown in the following, essentially non-commutative categorical diagram.

Definition 0.1   An ultra-complex system, $U_{CS}$ is defined as an object representation in the following non-commutative diagram of systems and dynamic system morphisms or `dynamic transformations':

$\displaystyle \xymatrix@C=5pc{[SUPER-COMPLEX] \ar [r] ^{(\textbf{Higher Dim})} ... ...-COMPLEX) \ar [d]^{onto}\\ COMPLEX& \ar [l] ^{(\textbf{Generic Map})}[SIMPLE]} $
Note that the above diagram is indeed not `natural' (i.e. it is not commutative) for reasons related to the emergence of the higher dimensions of the super-complex (biological/organismic) and/or ultra-complex (psychological/neural network dynamic) levels in comparison with the low dimensions of either simple (physical/classical) or complex (chaotic) dynamic systems.




"ultra-complex systems" is owned by bci1.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: categorical quantum logics as quantum LM-algebraic logic, Rosetta biogroupoids, strong AI thesis

Other names:  extremely complex systems, the mind
Keywords:  extremely complex systems, highest level of existence in Categorical Ontology
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: complex, simple, commutative, transformations, morphisms, dynamic system, representation, object, non-commutative, simple algebra, dimensions, higher dimensional algebras, characteristic, diagrams, categorical, square, levels, theory, categorical ontology, represents
There are 10 references to this entry.

This is version 16 of ultra-complex systems, born on 2008-07-12, modified 2008-10-18.
Object id is 10771, canonical name is UltraComplexSystems.
Accessed 1431 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC37B10 (Dynamical systems and ergodic theory :: Topological dynamics :: Symbolic dynamics)
 93D21 (Systems theory; control :: Stability :: Adaptive or robust stabilization)
 18A05 (Category theory; homological algebra :: General theory of categories and functors :: Definitions, generalizations)
 93D15 (Systems theory; control :: Stability :: Stabilization of systems by feedback)
 37B25 (Dynamical systems and ergodic theory :: Topological dynamics :: Lyapunov functions and stability; attractors, repellers)
 18A40 (Category theory; homological algebra :: General theory of categories and functors :: Adjoint functors )
 00A30 (General :: General and miscellaneous specific topics :: Philosophy of mathematics)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Rating by Koro on 2008-07-12 20:18:09
I see this entry rated twice by the same person, namely the author of the entry (giving top rating in all fields, of course).

Leaving aside the fact that the author is rating his own entry, which doesn't sound appropriate (and happens systematically with all entries by this author that I saw), it seems to me that having two ratings by the same user is a bug in the rating systems, isn't it?
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)