PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
Morita equivalence (Definition)

Let $ R$ be a ring. Write $ \mathcal{M}_R$ for the category of right modules over $ R$. Two rings $ R$ and $ S$ are said to be Morita equivalent if $ \mathcal{M}_R$ and $ \mathcal{M}_S$ are equivalent as categories. What this means is: we have two functors

$\displaystyle F:\mathcal{M}_R\to \mathcal{M}_S$    and $\displaystyle \qquad G:\mathcal{M}_S\to \mathcal{M}_R$
such that for any right $ R$-module $ M$ and any right $ S$-module $ N$, we have
$\displaystyle GF(M)\cong_R M$    and $\displaystyle \qquad FG(N)\cong_S N,$
where $ A \cong_R B$ means that there is an $ R$-module isomorphism between $ A$ and $ B$.

Example. Any ring $ R$ with $ 1$ is Morita equivalent to any matrix ring $ M_n(R)$ over it.

Proof. Assume $ n>1$. For convenience, we will also say a module to mean a right module.

Let $ M$ be an $ R$-module. Set $ F(M)=\lbrace (m_1,\ldots, m_n)\mid m_i\in M\rbrace$. Then $ F(M)$ becomes a module over $ M_n(R)$ if we adopt the standard matrix multiplication $ mA$, where $ m\in F(M)$ and $ A\in M_n(R)$. If $ f: M_1\to M_2$ is an $ R$-module homomorphism. Set $ F(f):F(M_1)\to F(M_2)$ by $ F(f)(m_1,\ldots,m_n)=(f(m_1),\ldots,f(m_n))\in F(M_2)$. Then $ F$ is a covariant functor by inspection.

Next, let $ N$ be an $ M_n(R)$-module. Write $ e(r)$ as the $ n\times n$ matrix whose cell $ (1,1)$ is $ r\in R$ and 0 everywhere else. For simplicity we write $ e:=e(1)$. Note that $ e$ is an idempotent in $ M_n(R)$: $ e=ee$, and $ e$ commutes with $ e(r)$ for any $ r\in R$: $ ee(r)=e(r)e$.

Set $ G(N)=\lbrace se\mid s\in N \rbrace$. For any $ r\in R$, define $ se\cdot r:= see(r)=se(r)e$. Since $ se(r)\in N$, this multiplication turns $ G(N)$ into an $ R$-module. If $ g:N_1\to N_2$ is an $ M_n(R)$-module homomorphism, define $ G(g): G(N_1)\to G(N_2)$ by $ G(g)(se)=g(s)e$. If $ N_1\stackrel{g}{\longrightarrow} N_2\stackrel{h}{\longrightarrow} N_3$ are $ M_n(R)$-module homomorphisms, then

$\displaystyle G(h\circ g)(se)=(h\circ g)(s)e=h(g(s))e = G(h)[g(s)e]=G(h)[G(g)se]=G(h)\circ G(g)(se) $
so that $ G$ is a covariant functor.

If $ M$ is any $ R$-module, then $ GF(M)=\lbrace (m_1,\ldots,m_n)e\mid m\in M \rbrace = \lbrace (m_1,0,\ldots,0)^T\mid m\in M \rbrace \cong M$, where $ m^T$ stands for the transpose of the row vector $ m\in M$ into a column vector.

On the other hand, if $ N$ is any $ M_n(R)$-module, then $ FG(N)=\lbrace (s_1e, \ldots, s_ne)\mid s_i\in N\rbrace$. Before proving that $ FG(N)\cong N$, let's do some preliminary work.

Denote $ e_{ii}$ by the $ n\times n$ matrix whose cell $ (i,i)$ is 1 and 0 everywhere else. Then each $ e_{ii}$ is idempotent, $ e_{ii}e_{jj}=0$ for $ i\ne j$, and $ e_{11}+\cdots + e_{nn}=1$. From this, we see that $ N=N_1\oplus \cdots \oplus N_n$, where $ N_i=Ne_{ii}$, and $ N_i\cong N_j$ as $ M_n(R)$-modules. Since $ N_1=Ne$ has an $ R$-module structure as we had shown earlier, $ N_i$ are all $ R$-modules. Let $ \pi_i:N\to N_i$ be the projection map, $ \psi_i: N_i\to N$ be the embedding of $ N_i$ into $ N$, and $ \phi_{ij}:N_i\to N_j$ be the isomorphism from $ N_i$ to $ N_j$ given by $ \phi_{ij}(se_{ii})=se_{jj}$. All these are $ M_n(R)$-module homomorphisms since $ e_{ii}A=Ae_{ii}$.

Now, take any $ s\in N$, then $ s \mapsto (\pi_1(s),\ldots,\pi_n(s)) \mapsto (\phi_{11}\pi_1(s),\ldots,\phi_{n1}\pi_n(s)) \in FG(N)$ is a homomorphism $ \alpha: N\to FG(N)$. Conversely, $ (s_1e,\ldots,s_n e)\mapsto (\phi_{11}(s_1e),\ldots, \phi_{1n}(s_ne)) \mapsto \psi_1(\phi_{11}(s_1e))+\cdots + \psi_n(\phi_{1n}(s_ne)) \in N$ is also a homomorphism $ \beta: FG(N)\to N$. By inspection, $ \alpha$ and $ \beta$ are inverses of each other, and hence $ FG(N)\cong N$. $ \qedsymbol$

Remark. A property $ P$ in the class of all rings is said to be Morita invariant if, whenever $ R$ has property $ P$ and $ S$ is Morita equivalent to $ R$, then $ S$ has property $ P$ as well. By the example above, it is clear that commutativity is not a Morita invariant property.



"Morita equivalence" is owned by CWoo. [ full author list (2) ]
(view preamble)

View style:

Also defines:  Morita equivalent, Morita invariance, Morita invariant
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: commutativity, clear, class, property, inverses, embedding, projection map, structure, column vector, row vector, transpose, multiplication, idempotent, cell, matrix, homomorphism, standard matrix multiplication, mean, module, matrix ring, right, functors, right modules, category, ring
There are 2 references to this entry.

This is version 3 of Morita equivalence, born on 2007-01-30, modified 2007-01-30.
Object id is 8851, canonical name is MoritaEquivalence.
Accessed 1592 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC16D90 (Associative rings and algebras :: Modules, bimodules and ideals :: Module categories ; module theory in a category-theoretic context; Morita equivalence and duality)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)