|
|
|
|
proof that is prime for
|
(Proof)
|
|
|
We show that for
, is prime. Of course, this can easily be seen by considering the cases, but the proof given here is illustrative of why the statement is true.
Recall that there is only one reduced integral binary quadratic form of discriminant ; that form is
. The smallest prime that is represented by that form is . For suppose
and . Then obviously , so , which is impossible. Since equivalent forms represent the same set of integers, it follows that any form of discriminant represents no primes less than .
Now suppose is composite for some . Then
and thus has a prime factor . Write
; then
represents ( ); its discriminant is
Since there is only one equivalence class of forms with discriminant ,
is equivalent to
and thus represents the same integers. But we know that
cannot represent any prime , so cannot represent . Contradiction. So is prime for .
This proof works equally well for the other cases mentioned in the parent article, since for each of those cases, there is only one reduced form of the appropriate discriminant, which is .
|
"proof that is prime for " is owned by rm50.
|
|
(view preamble)
Cross-references: parent, contradiction, equivalence class, prime factor, composite, integers, represent, equivalent, discriminant, integral binary quadratic form, prime
This is version 4 of proof that is prime for , born on 2007-04-15, modified 2007-04-15.
Object id is 9195, canonical name is ProofThatN2N41IsPrimeFor0leqNleq39.
Accessed 1313 times total.
Classification:
| AMS MSC: | 11A41 (Number theory :: Elementary number theory :: Primes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pending Errata and Addenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|