PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] proof that transition functions of cotangent bundle are valid (Proof)

In this entry, we shall verify that the transition functions proposed for the cotangent bundle the three criteria required by the classical definition of a manifold.

The first criterion is the easiest to verify. If $\alpha = \beta$ , then $\sigma_{\alpha \alpha}$ reduces to the identity and we have $$\bigg({\sigma'}_{\alpha \alpha} (x_1, \ldots, x_{2n}) \bigg)^i = \bigg(\sigma_{\alpha \alpha} (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \bigg)^i = x^i \qquad 1 \le i \le n $$ $$\bigg({\sigma'}_{\alpha \alpha} (x_1, \ldots, x_{2n}) \bigg)^{i+n} = \sum_{j = 1}^n {\partial \bigg(\sigma_{\alpha \alpha} (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \bigg)^i \over \partial x_j} x^{j+n} = \sum_{j = 1}^n {\partial x^i \over \partial x_j} x^{j+n} = x^{i+n} \qquad 1 \le i \le n$$ Thus we see that ${\sigma'}_{\alpha \alpha}$ is the identity map, as required.

Next, we turn our attention to the third criterion -- showing that ${\sigma'}_{\beta \gamma} \circ {\sigma'}_{\alpha \beta} = {\sigma'}_{\alpha \gamma}$ . For clarity of notation let us define $y^i = ({\sigma'}_{\alpha \beta})^i (x^1, \ldots x^{2n})$ . Then we have \begin{eqnarray*} ({\sigma'}_{\beta \gamma} \circ {\sigma'}_{\alpha \beta})^i (x^1, \dots, x^{2n}) &=& ({\sigma'}_{\beta \gamma})^i (y^1, \dots, y^{2n}) \\ &=& (\sigma_{\beta \gamma})^i (y^1, \dots, y^n) \\ &=& (\sigma_{\beta \gamma} \circ \sigma_{\alpha \beta})^i (x^1, \dots, x^n) \\ &=& (\sigma_{\alpha \gamma})^i (x^1, \dots, x^n) \\ &=& ({\sigma'}_{\alpha \gamma})^i (x^1, \dots, x^{2n}) \\ \end{eqnarray*}when $1 \le i \le n $ . \begin{eqnarray*} ({\sigma'}_{\beta \gamma} \circ {\sigma'}_{\alpha \beta})^{i+n} (x^1, \dots, x^{2n}) &=& ({\sigma'}_{\beta \gamma})^{i+n} (y^1, \dots, y^{2n}) \\ &=& \sum_{j = 1}^n {\partial \bigg(\sigma_{\beta \gamma} (y_1, \ldots, y_n) \bigg)^i \over \partial y_j} y^{j+n} \\ &=& \sum_{j = 1}^n \sum_{k = 1}^n {\partial \bigg(\sigma_{\beta \gamma} (y_1, \ldots, y_n) \bigg)^i \over \partial y_j} {\partial \bigg(\sigma_{\alpha \beta} (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \bigg)^j \over \partial x_k} x^{n+k} \\ &=& \sum_{k = 1}^n {\partial \bigg(\sigma_{\beta \gamma} \circ \sigma_{\alpha \beta} (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \bigg)^i \over \partial x_k} x^{n+k} \\ &=& \sum_{k = 1}^n {\partial \bigg(\sigma_{\alpha \gamma} (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \bigg)^i \over \partial x_k} x^{n+k} \\ &=& {\sigma'}_{\alpha \gamma} (x^1, \dots, x^{2n}) \\ \end{eqnarray*}when $1 \le i \le n $ .

Finally, the second criterion does not need to be checked because it is a consequence of the first and third criteria.




"proof that transition functions of cotangent bundle are valid" is owned by rspuzio.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: consequence, identity map, identity, manifold, cotangent bundle, transition functions

This is version 10 of proof that transition functions of cotangent bundle are valid, born on 2004-12-10, modified 2004-12-20.
Object id is 6550, canonical name is ProofThatTransitionFunctionsOfCotangentBundleAreValid.
Accessed 1245 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC58A32 (Global analysis, analysis on manifolds :: General theory of differentiable manifolds :: Natural bundles)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)