PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: Very high
[parent] regular at infinity (Definition)

When the function $w$ of one complex variable is regular in the annulus $$\varrho < |z| < \infty,$$ it has a Laurent expansion

$\displaystyle w(z) = \sum_{j=-\infty}^{\infty}c_nz^n.$ (1)

If especially the coefficients $c_1,\, c_2,\,\ldots$ vanish, then we have $$w(z) = c_0+\frac{c_{-1}}{z}+\frac{c_{-2}}{z^2}+\ldots$$ Using the inversion $z = \frac{1}{\zeta}$ , we see that the function $$w\!\left(\frac{1}{\zeta}\right) = c_0+c_{-1}\zeta+c_{-2}\zeta^2+\ldots$$ is regular in the disc $|\zeta| < \varrho$ . Accordingly we can define that the function $w$ is regular at infinity also.

For example, $\displaystyle w(z) := \frac{1}{z}$ is regular at the point $z = \infty$ .




"regular at infinity" is owned by pahio.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: regular function, closed complex plane, vanish at infinity

Other names:  analytic at infinity
Keywords:  regular

This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: point, disc, inversion, vanish, coefficients, Laurent expansion, annulus, regular, variable, complex, function
There are 2 references to this entry.

This is version 3 of regular at infinity, born on 2007-11-16, modified 2008-02-23.
Object id is 10045, canonical name is RegularAtInfinity.
Accessed 1465 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC30D20 (Functions of a complex variable :: Entire and meromorphic functions, and related topics :: Entire functions, general theory)
 32A10 (Several complex variables and analytic spaces :: Holomorphic functions of several complex variables :: Holomorphic functions)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Little suggestion by CompositeFan on 2007-11-16 17:37:47
I would suggest changing

$$w(\frac{1}{\zeta}) = c_0+c_{-1}\zeta+c_{-2}\zeta^2+\ldots$$

to

$$w \left( \frac{1}{\zeta} \right) = c_0 + c_{-1} \zeta + c_{-2} \zeta^2 + \ldots$$

so that the parentheses for the fraction go all the way in both directions, though that would make it look like the Jacobi symbol or something; anyway as for the spacing, it never hurts.
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)