|
|
|
|
relative complement
|
(Definition)
|
|
|
A complement of an element in a lattice is only defined when the lattice in question is bounded. In general, a lattice is not bounded and there are no complements to speak of. Nevertheless, if the sublattice of a lattice is bounded, we can speak of complements of an element relative to that sublattice.
Let be a lattice, an element of , and an interval in . An element is said to be a complement of relative to
if
 and 
It is easy to see that and , so . Similarly, .
An element is said to be relatively complemented if for every interval in with , it has a complement relative to . The lattice itself is called a relatively complemented lattice if every element of is relatively complemented. Equivalently, is relatively complemented iff each of its interval is a complemented lattice.
Remarks.
- A relatively complemented lattice is complemented if it is bounded. Conversely, a complemented lattice is relatively complemented if it is modular.
- The notion of a relative complement of an element in a lattice has nothing to do with that found in set theory: let
be a set and subsets of , the relative complement of in is the set theoretic difference . While the relative difference is necessarily a subset of , does not have to be a subset of .
|
"relative complement" is owned by CWoo. [ full author list (2) ]
|
|
(view preamble)
Cross-references: difference, subsets, set theory, complemented lattice, iff, easy to see, sublattice, lattice, complement
There are 3 references to this entry.
This is version 8 of relative complement, born on 2006-04-21, modified 2008-04-08.
Object id is 7852, canonical name is RelativeComplement.
Accessed 1912 times total.
Classification:
| AMS MSC: | 06C15 (Order, lattices, ordered algebraic structures :: Modular lattices, complemented lattices :: Complemented lattices, orthocomplemented lattices and posets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pending Errata and Addenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|