PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
Sidon set (Definition)

A set of natural numbers is called a Sidon set if all pairwise sums of its elements are distinct. Equivalently, the equation $ a+b=c+d$ has only the trivial solution $ \{a,b\}=\{c,d\}$ in elements of the set.

Sidon sets are a special case of so-called $ B_h[g]$ sets. A set $ A$ is called a $ B_h[g]$ set if for every $ n\in \mathbb{N}$ the equation $ n=a_1+\dotsc+a_h$ has at most $ g$ different solutions with $ a_1\leq \dotsb\leq a_h$ being elements of $ A$. The Sidon sets are $ B_2[1]$ sets.

Define $ F_h(n,g)$ as the size of the largest $ B_h[g]$ set contained in the interval $ [1,n]$. Whereas it is known that $ F_2(n,1)=n^{1/2}+O(n^{5/16})$[3, p. 85], no asymptotical results are known for $ g>1$ or $ h>2$ [2].

Every finite set has a rather large $ B_h[1]$ subset. Komlós, Sulyok, and Szemerédi[4] proved that in every $ n$-element set there is a $ B_h[1]$ subset of size at least $ cF_h(n,1)$ for $ c=\tfrac{1}{8}(2h)^{-6}$. For Sidon sets Abbott[1] improved that to $ c=2/25$. It is not known whether one can take $ c=1$.

The infinite $ B_h[g]$ sets are understood even worse. Erdős [3, p. 89] proved that for every infinite Sidon set $ A$ we have $ \liminf_{n\to\infty}(n/\log n)^{-1/2} \left\lvert A\cap [1,n]\right\rvert <C$ for some constant $ C$. On the other hand, for a long time no example of a set for which $ \left\lvert A\cap [1,n]\right\rvert >n^{1/3+\epsilon}$ for some $ \epsilon>0$ was known. Only recently Ruzsa[6] used an extremely clever construction to prove the existence of a set $ A$ for which $ \left\lvert A\cap [1,n]\right\rvert >n^{\sqrt{2}-1-\epsilon}$ for every $ \epsilon>0$ and for all sufficiently large $ n$.

For an excellent survey of Sidon sets see [5].

References

1
Harvey Leslie Abbott.
Sidon sets.
Canad. Math. Bull., 33(3):335-341, 1990.
Zbl 0715.11004.
2
Ben Green.
$ B_h[g]$ sets: The current state of affairs.
http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/˜bjg23/papers/bhgbounds.dvi, 2000.
3
Heini Halberstam and Klaus Friedrich Roth.
Sequences.
Springer-Verlag, second edition, 1983.
Zbl 0498.10001.
4
János Komlós, Miklos Sulyok, and Endre Szemerédi.
Linear problems in combinatorial number theory.
Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung., 26:113-121, 1975.
Zbl 0303.10058.
5
Kevin O'Bryant.
A complete annotated bibliography of work related to Sidon sequences.
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics.
http://arxiv.org/abs/math.NT/0407117.
6
Imre Ruzsa.
An infinite Sidon sequence.
J. Number Theory, 68(1):63-71, 1998.
Available at http://www.math-inst.hu/˜ruzsa/cikkek.html.



"Sidon set" is owned by bbukh.
(view preamble)

View style:

See Also: Erdős-Turan conjecture

Other names:  Sidon sequence
Also defines:  $B_h[g]$ set
Keywords:  difference set
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: even, infinite, subset, finite set, interval, contained, size, solution, equation, sums, natural numbers

This is version 9 of Sidon set, born on 2003-10-11, modified 2004-12-07.
Object id is 4771, canonical name is SidonSet.
Accessed 5470 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC11B05 (Number theory :: Sequences and sets :: Density, gaps, topology)
 11B34 (Number theory :: Sequences and sets :: Representation functions)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 1 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Mian-Chowla question by PrimeFan on 2006-12-11 18:22:04
If we can stop talking about elliptical spaces in hypothetically large n-dimensional space and curvature tensors of antitime for a minute, I would like to ask a very mundane, perhaps even vulgar, question, and I will be grateful to anyone who doesn't mind to step down from the usual lofty planes to such a low level of inquiry for a minute.

Why does the Mian-Chowla sequence go 1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 21, 31, ... (A5282)? Why couldn't it go, say, 1, 2, 3, ... ? To rule out 3 the only thing I can come up with is making the sequence 0, 1, 2, 4, ... but then I still can't rule out 7 to favor 8. Have I missed something very basic here?
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)