PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
horseshoe lemma (Theorem)

Let $ \mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category with enough projectives. The horseshoe lemma, also called the simultaneous resolution theorem, says that if

$\displaystyle \begin{xy} *!C\xybox{ \xymatrix{ & & & 0\ar[d] & \ \cdots\ar[r]... ...r] & P''_1\ar[r] & P''_0\ar[r] & A''\ar[r]\ar[d] & 0 \ & & & 0 & } } \end{xy}$
is a diagram in $ \mathcal{A}$ such that the column is exact and the rows are projective resolutions of $ A'$ and $ A''$ respectively, then it can be filled to a commutative diagram
$\displaystyle \begin{xy} *!C\xybox{ \xymatrix{ & 0\ar[d] & 0\ar[d] & 0\ar[d] & ... ...\ar[d] & P''_0\ar[r]\ar[d] & A''\ar[r]\ar[d] & 0 \ & 0 & 0 & 0 & } } \end{xy}$
where all columns are exact, the middle row is a projective resolution of $ A$, and $ P_n=P'_n\oplus P''_n$ for all $ n$. If $ \mathcal{A}$ is an abelian category with enough injectives, the dual statement also holds.
Proof. We fill in the diagram a column at a time, proving exactness along the way. First we construct a surjective map $ \pi\colon P_0\to A$. There is a map from $ P'_0$ to $ A$, the composition $ P'_0\to A'\to A$. Since $ P''_0$ is projective, there is a filler for the diagram
$\displaystyle \begin{xy} *!C\xybox{ \xymatrix{ & P''_0\ar[d]\ar@{.>}[ld] & \ A\ar[r] & A''\ar[r] & 0 } } \end{xy}$
Since $ P_0$ is the coproduct of $ P'_0$ and $ P''_0$, there is a unique filler $ \pi$ for the diagram
$\displaystyle \begin{xy} *!C\xybox{ \xymatrix{ P'_0\ar[r]\ar[rd] & P_0\ar@{.>}[d]^{\pi} & P''_0\ar[l]\ar[ld] \ & A & } } \end{xy}$
The diagram
$\displaystyle \begin{xy} *!C\xybox{ \xymatrix{ 0\ar[r] & P'_0\ar[r]\ar[d] & P_0... ...0\ar[r]\ar[d] & 0 \ 0\ar[r] & A'\ar[r] & A\ar[r] & A''\ar[r] & 0 } } \end{xy}$
is commutative and has exact rows, so we may apply the short five lemma to conclude that $ \pi$ is surjective.

Now assume for induction that we have constructed a partial resolution of $ A$ in this manner, yielding a diagram

$\displaystyle \begin{xy} *!C\xybox{ \xymatrix{ 0\ar[d] & 0\ar[d] & & 0\ar[d] & ... ...ar[r]\ar[d] & \cdots\ar[r] & A''\ar[r]\ar[d] & 0 \ 0 & 0 & & 0 & } } \end{xy}$
with exact rows and columns. (We are not assuming here that $ n>0$; if $ n=0$, then $ P'_{n-1}$ denotes $ A'$ and $ P'_{n-2}$ denotes 0; similar substitutions apply). By the snake lemma, there is a commutative diagram
$\displaystyle \begin{xy} *!C\xybox{ \xymatrix{ 0\ar[r] & \ker d'_n\ar[r]\ar[d] ... ...\ 0\ar[r] & P'_{n-2}\ar[r] & P_{n-2}\ar[r] & P''_{n-2}\ar[r] & 0 } } \end{xy}$
with exact rows and columns. In fact, the map $ \ker d_n\to\ker d''_n$ is surjective; this can be verified by a diagram chase. We can construct a surjective map $ b_{n+1}\colon P_{n+1}\to\ker d_n$ in the same way we constructed $ \pi$. Specifically, there is a map $ P'_{n+1}\to\ker d'_n$ obtained by composition, and there is a filler for the diagram
$\displaystyle \begin{xy} *!C\xybox{ \xymatrix{ & P''_n\ar[d]\ar@{.>}[ld] & \ \ker d_n\ar[r] & \ker d''_n\ar[r] & 0 } } \end{xy}$
These maps determine $ b_{n+1}$ uniquely. Define $ d_{n+1}\colon P_{n+1}\to P_n$ as the composition $ P_{n+1}\xrightarrow{b_{n+1}} \ker d_n\hookrightarrow P_n$; since $ b_{n+1}$ is surjective, the sequence $ P_{n+1}\to P_n\to P_{n-1}$ is exact. Hence we have managed to construct a diagram
$\displaystyle \begin{xy} *!C\xybox{ \xymatrix{ 0\ar[d] & 0\ar[d] & 0\ar[d] & & ... ...]\ar[d] & \cdots\ar[r] & A''\ar[r]\ar[d] & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & & 0 & } } \end{xy}$
with exact rows and columns. This completes the proof. $ \qedsymbol$

Bibliography

1
Cartan, H. and S. Eilenberg, Homological algebra, Princeton University Press, 1956.
2
Osborne, M. S., Basic homological algebra, Springer-Verlag, 2000.



Anyone with an account can edit this entry. Please help improve it!

"horseshoe lemma" is owned by mps.
(view preamble)

View style:

Other names:  simultaneous resolution theorem
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: proof, snake lemma, similar, induction, coproduct, composition, map, surjective, enough injectives, commutative diagram, projective resolutions, enough projectives, abelian category
There is 1 reference to this entry.

This is version 2 of horseshoe lemma, born on 2006-04-02, modified 2006-04-02.
Object id is 7799, canonical name is HorseshoeLemma.
Accessed 1423 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC18G10 (Category theory; homological algebra :: Homological algebra :: Resolutions; derived functors)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | prove | add result | add corollary | add example | add (any)