PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
sections
Encyclopædia
Papers
Books
Expositions

meta
Requests (236)
Orphanage
Unclass'd (1)
Unproven (541)
Corrections (47)
Classification

talkback
Polls
Forums
Feedback
Bug Reports

downloads
Snapshots
PM Book

information
News
Docs
Wiki
ChangeLog
TODO List
Copyright
About
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] vector product in general vector spaces (Definition)
VectorProductInGeneralVectorSpaces

"vector product in general vector spaces" is owned by mathwizard.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

Other names:  vector product

This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: perpendicular, Euclidean vector space, linearly dependent, properties, vectors, basis, vector space, finite dimensional
There are 5 references to this entry.

This is version 2 of vector product in general vector spaces, born on 2004-08-09, modified 2004-08-09.
Object id is 6089, canonical name is VectorProductInGeneralVectorSpaces.
Accessed 6028 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC: 15A72 (Linear and multilinear algebra; matrix theory :: Vector and tensor algebra, theory of invariants)
Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 2 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
A (better?) definition by stevecheng on 2005-07-13 18:29:38
Hello,
I think the following definition is slightly better than the current one (though equivalent for orthnormal {v_i})

For a n-dimensional inner product space,
the cross product $z = v_1 \times \dotm \times v_{n-1}$
is the vector such that

$\langle z, w \rangle = \det(v_1, \dotsb, v_{n-1}, w$

for all vectors $w$.

The angle $z$ exists and is unique by the (finite-dimensional) Riesz Representation Theorem. Or it could be constructed simply by setting $w = e_1, e_2, \dotsc$
(i.e. the basis vectors) successively.

By the way, this comes from Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds book.

I think this definition is better because it avoids the use of a basis representation,
and most of the properties for the cross product that have to be painstakingly
proven for R^3 become almost trivial with this definition.
(e.g. the triple product formula, invariance under rotations and under change
of bases of the same orientation, etc.)
[ reply | up ]
Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)