PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
weak approximation theorem (Theorem)

The weak approximation theorem allows selection, in a Dedekind ring, of an element having specific valuations at a specific finite set of primes, and nonnegative valuations at all other primes. It is essentially a generalization of the Chinese Remainder theorem, as is evident from its proof.

Theorem 1 (Weak Approximation Theorem)   Let $A$ be a Dedekind domain with fraction field $K$ . Then for any finite set $ \mathfrak{p}_1,\dotsc,\mathfrak{p}_k$ of primes of $A$ and integers $ a_1,\dotsc,a_k$ , there is $x\in K^{\star}$ such that $\nu_{\smp_i}((x))=a_i$ and for all other prime ideals $\smp$ , $\nu_{\smp}((x))\geq 0$ . Here $\nu_{\smp}$ is the $\smp$ -adic valuation associated with a prime ideal $\smp$ .
Proof. Assume first that all $a_i\geq 0$ . By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, $$ A/\smp_1^{a_1+1}\times\cdots A/\smp_k^{a_k+1}\cong A/\smp_1^{a_1+1}\cdots\smp_k^{a_k+1} $$ Thus the map $$ A\to A/\smp_1^{a_1+1}\times\cdots A/\smp_k^{a_k+1} $$ is surjective. Now choose $x_i\in p_i^{a_i}, x_i\notin p_i^{a_i+1}$ ; this is possible since these two ideals are unequal by unique factorization. Choose $x\in A$ with image $ (x_1,\dotsc,x_k)$ . Clearly $\nu_{\smp_i}((x))=a_i$ . But $x\in A$ , so all other valuations are nonnegative.

In the general case, assume wlog that we are given a set $ \mathfrak{p}_1,\dotsc,\mathfrak{p}_r$ of primes of $A$ and integers $ a_1,\dotsc,a_r\geq 0$ , and a set $ \mathfrak{q}_1,\dotsc,\mathfrak{q}_t$ of primes with integers $ b_1,\dotsc,b_t<0$ . First choose $y\in K^{\star}$ (using the case already proved above) so that

\begin{displaymath} \begin{cases} \nu_{\mathfrak{p}}((y)) = 0 & \mathfrak{p}= \m... ... \nu_{\mathfrak{p}}((y)) \geq 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \end{displaymath}
Now, there are only a finite number of primes $\smp'_k$ such that $\smp'_k$ is not the same as any of the $\smq_j$ and $\nu_{\smp'_k}((y))>0$ . Let $\nu_{\smp'_k}((y)) = c_k>0$ . Again using the case proved above, choose $x\in K^{\star}$ such that

\begin{displaymath} \begin{cases} \nu_{\mathfrak{p}}((x)) = a_i & \mathfrak{p}= ... ... \nu_{\mathfrak{p}}((x)) \geq 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \end{displaymath}
Then $x/y$ is the required element. $ \qedsymbol$




"weak approximation theorem" is owned by rm50.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: independence of valuations, Chinese remainder theorem in terms of divisor theory

Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: number, finite, WLOG, image, unique factorization, ideals, surjective, map, prime ideals, integers, fraction field, Dedekind domain, proof, Chinese remainder theorem, primes, finite set, valuations, ring
There is 1 reference to this entry.

This is version 3 of weak approximation theorem, born on 2008-12-07, modified 2008-12-07.
Object id is 11316, canonical name is WeakApproximationTheorem.
Accessed 516 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC13F05 (Commutative rings and algebras :: Arithmetic rings and other special rings :: Dedekind, Prüfer and Krull rings and their generalizations)
 11R04 (Number theory :: Algebraic number theory: global fields :: Algebraic numbers; rings of algebraic integers)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | prove | add result | add corollary | add example | add (any)