(more info)
Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia
|
Requests
|
Forums
|
Docs
|
Wiki
|
Random
|
RSS
Advanced search
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
sections
Encyclopædia
Papers
Books
Expositions
meta
Requests
(195)
Orphanage
Unclass'd
Unproven
(498)
Corrections
(25)
Classification
talkback
Polls
Forums
Feedback
Bug Reports
downloads
Snapshots
PM Book
information
News
Docs
Wiki
ChangeLog
TODO List
Legalese
About
Wilson's theorem
(Theorem)
Wilson's theorem states that
iff
is
prime
(note that it must be
positive
).
"Wilson's theorem" is owned by
CWoo
.
[
full author list
(2) |
owner history
(1) ]
(
view preamble
)
View style:
HTML with images
page images
TeX source
See Also:
an algebraic identity leading to Wilson's theorem
,
polynomial congruence
Other names:
Wilson-Lagrange theorem
Attachments:
proof of Wilson's theorem
(Proof)
by Cosmin
group theoretic proof of Wilson's theorem
(Proof)
by ottocolori
Wilson's theorem result
(Result)
by mathwizard
Wilson prime
(Definition)
by PrimeFan
Wilson quotient
(Definition)
by PrimeFan
Clement's theorem on twin primes
(Theorem)
by PrimeFan
converse of Wilson's theorem
(Theorem)
by PrimeFan
Log in to rate this entry.
(
view current ratings
)
Cross-references:
positive
,
prime
,
iff
There are
6 references
to this entry.
This is
version 8
of
Wilson's theorem
, born on 2001-08-13, modified 2008-05-17.
Object id is
11
, canonical name is
WilsonsTheorem
.
Accessed 8788 times total.
Classification:
AMS MSC
:
11-00
(Number theory :: General reference works )
Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[
View all 4
]
Discussion
Style:
Flat
Threaded
Expand:
all
none
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Order:
Oldest First
Newest first
forum policy
Negative primes
by
pahio
on 2005-10-18 12:41:49
I perceive that not all people here believe the negative primes (-2, -3, -5 and so on). But in number-theoretical sense, they are as good as the positive primes, since both have exactly same divisibily properties. And ideal-theoretically, p and -p generate the same principal ideal, as always do the associates. In the other algebraic number fields than Q we, in fact, can not say that some of the associated primes is "better" or "more correct" than some else.
The (rational) prime defined in PM may be negative equally as positive.
Jussi
[
reply
|
up
]
Re: Negative primes (seeking comment)
by akrowne
on 2005-10-18 12:57:14
Re: Negative primes (seeking comment)
by mathcam
on 2005-10-18 19:26:08
Re: Negative primes (seeking comment)
by mathcam
on 2005-10-18 19:30:35
Re: Negative primes (seeking comment)
by alozano
on 2005-10-19 09:46:03
Re: Negative primes (seeking comment)
by vernondalhart
on 2005-10-19 11:36:31
even better...
by
drini
on 2001-08-20 21:40:26
$p$ is a prime
IF AND ONLY IF
$(p-1)!\equiv -1\pmod{p}$
now tell me, isn't that great?
f
G ---------> H
\ ^ G
p \ /_ ----- ~ f(G)
\ / f ker f
Y /
G/ker f
[
reply
|
up
]
Re: even better... (Wilson's th.)
by pahio
on 2005-02-23 10:26:46
Re: even better...
by rspuzio
on 2005-02-23 13:28:34
Re: even better...
by drini
on 2005-02-23 13:50:01
Re: even better...
by rspuzio
on 2005-02-23 14:30:51
Re: even better...
by pahio
on 2005-02-24 15:14:43
Interact
post
|
correct
|
update request
|
prove
|
add result
|
add corollary
|
add example
|
add (any)