PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people.
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Medium Entry average rating: Very high
[parent] law of signs under multiplication in a ring (Derivation)
Lemma 1   Let $ R$ be a ring with unity, which we denote by $ 1$. For all $ x,y\in R$:
$\displaystyle (-x)\cdot (-y)=x\cdot y$
where $ -x$ denotes the additive inverse of $ x$ in $ R$.
Proof. Here we use the fact $ (-1)\cdot a = -a$ for all $ a \in R$. First, we see that:

$\displaystyle (-1)\cdot (-1)\cdot a=(-1)\cdot \left( (-1)\cdot a \right)=(-1)\cdot (-a)=a$
since, clearly, the additive inverse of $ -a$ is $ a$ itself.

Hence:

$\displaystyle (-x)\cdot (-y)=(-1)\cdot x \cdot (-1)\cdot y= (-1)\cdot (-1) \cdot x\cdot y= x \cdot y$
where we have used several times the associativity of $ \cdot$ and the fact that $ (-1)\cdot x = x \cdot (-1) = -x$. $ \qedsymbol$



"law of signs under multiplication in a ring" is owned by alozano.
(view preamble)

View style:

See Also: ring

Other names:  $(-x)\cdot (-y)= x\cdot y$

This object's parent.

Attachments:
product of negative numbers (Derivation) by pahio
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: associativity, inverse, additive, ring with unity
There are 2 references to this entry.

This is version 7 of law of signs under multiplication in a ring, born on 2004-03-09, modified 2006-03-10.
Object id is 5675, canonical name is XcdotYXcdotY.
Accessed 3434 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC13-00 (Commutative rings and algebras :: General reference works )
 16-00 (Associative rings and algebras :: General reference works )
 20-00 (Group theory and generalizations :: General reference works )

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 3 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
prove needs prove by mj on 2005-01-27 15:20:38

It seems to me that in this prove the part (-1)*(-a)=a needs to be prove dand I'm not sure if it is...
[ reply | up ]
(-x).(-y)=x.y by perucho on 2004-08-05 03:04:52

Also the additive inverse of (-1) is 1.

[ reply | up ]
entry title by drini on 2004-03-09 13:50:53

shouldn't this be better titled "law of signs" or some other common phrasing?
 f
G -----> H G
p \ /_ ----- ~ f(G)
 \ / f ker f
 G/ker f 
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)