You are here
Home ›hyperbolic set
Primary tabs
hyperbolic set
Let be a compact smooth manifold, and let be a diffeomorphism. An -invariant subset of is said to be hyperbolic (or to have an hyperbolic structure) if there is a splitting of the tangent bundle of restricted to into a (Whitney) sum of two -invariant subbundles, and such that the restriction of is a contraction and is an expansion. This means that there are constants and such that
1. ;
2. and for each ;
3. for each and ;
4. for each and .
using some Riemannian metric on .
If is hyperbolic, then there exists an adapted Riemannian metric, i.e. one such that .
Related:
HyperbolicFixedPoint
Synonym:
hyperbolic structure, uniformly hyperbolic
Type of Math Object:
Definition
Major Section:
Reference
Mathematics Subject Classification
37D20 Uniformly hyperbolic systems (expanding, Anosov, Axiom A, etc.)- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
May 22
new question: Linear Algebra Combination Problem! by unlord
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
May 21
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord
new question: Linear Algebra Combination Problem! by unlord
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
May 21
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord



Comments
anoteher PM article on same topic
It appears that PM has another article on the same topic
http://planetmath.org/?op=getobj&from=objects&id=3315
perhaps these should be merged??
Re: anoteher PM article on same topic
It's not on the same topic.
For startes, my article is a definition, while the other is a theorem.
This one is about diffeomorphisms, and the other about flows.
My definition is about hyperbolic structure on invariant subsets, and the theorem in the other entry is about existence of stable/unstable manifolds for singularities of flows.
Re: anoteher PM article on same topic
OK, whatever, as you please. Its just that flows are usually diffeomorphisms, and the structure fo the stable/unstable manifolds often are hyperbolic; the geodesic and horocycle flows being the classic textbook examples. It just seemed to me that a unified presentation of the topic would be more enlightening than a set of random disconnected factoids, neither the one article mentioning the other, or v.v. As a minimum, it might be nice to at least have a "see also" section in each artcle.
Re: anoteher PM article on same topic
>OK, whatever, as you please. Its just that flows are usually >diffeomorphisms, and the structure fo the stable/unstable manifolds >often are hyperbolic;
I'm not sure what you mean by "flows are usually diffeomorphisms" (they are not) and by the hyperbolic structure either.
Nor I understand how the geodesic flow being (in some cases) hyperbolic is related to the stable manifold theorem for fixed points of flows (the other entry in question) or to the definition of hyperbolic set for diffeomorphisms (if you want me to mention the analogous definition for flows in my entry, you could request that by filing an addendum)
The two entries do not fit well together, and they should not be merged just because they belong to the same sub-area of mathematics.