𝕃p vs 𝕃q


Let (X,𝒜,μ) be a measure spaceMathworldPlanetmath and 1≤p,q≤∞. Generally there is no connection between 𝕃p⁢(μ) and 𝕃q⁢(μ) as sets. However, for some special measures, there is an interesting relationship between them. A few examples:

  1. 1.

    If λn is the Lebesgue measureMathworldPlanetmath on ℝn and p≠q, then 𝕃p⁢(λn)⊈𝕃q⁢(λn) for all n∈ℕ+. Here is an example for n=1 and 1≤p<q<∞. Let

    f⁢(x):={x-1p,x>10,x≤1

    and

    g⁢(x):={x-1q,x∈(0,1)0,x∉(0,1).

    This gives ∥f∥qq=pq-p, ∥g∥pp=qq-p and ∥f∥p=∥g∥q=∞. So f∈𝕃q∖𝕃p and g∈𝕃p∖𝕃q. For the ∞-norm, χℝ∈𝕃∞∖𝕃q, where χ is the characteristic functionMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath, and also f∉𝕃∞.

  2. 2.

    If p<q then lp⊆lq. This is trivial if q=∞. Now let x=(x0,x1,…)∈lp and q<∞. Then

    ∥x∥qq=∑n=0∞|xn|q=∑n=0∞|xn|p⁢|xn|q-p≤∑n=0∞|xn|p⁢∥x∥∞q-p=∥x∥∞q-p⁢∥x∥pp<∞,

    so x∈lq.

  3. 3.

    If μ⁢(X) is finite and p<q, then 𝕃q⊆𝕃p. This is easy if q=∞, because |f|≤∥f∥∞ almost everywhere, so ∥f∥pp=∫|f|p⁢𝑑μ≤∫∥f∥∞p⁢𝑑μ=∥f∥∞p⁢μ⁢(X)<∞. Now let q<∞, thus

    ∥f∥pp =∫|f|p⁢𝑑μ
    =∫|f|>1|f|p⁢𝑑μ+∫|f|≤1|f|p⁢𝑑μ
    ≤∫|f|>1|f|q⁢𝑑μ+∫|f|≤1𝑑μ
    ≤∥f∥qq+μ⁢(X)
    <∞.

Finally, we prove an interesting property for p-norms: if X is a finite measure space, then for any measurable functionMathworldPlanetmath f on X the equality limp→∞⁡∥f∥p=∥f∥∞ holds. We have already seen that ∥f∥p≤∥f∥∞⁢μ⁢(X)1p. Now for any ε∈(0,∥f∥∞) define Aε:={x∈X:|f⁢(x)|≥∥f∥∞-ε}, δε:=μ⁢(Aε)>0 and g:=(∥f∥∞-ε)⁢χAε. Since |g|≤|f|, we have ∥g∥p=(∥f∥∞-ε)⁢δε1p≤∥f∥p≤∥f∥∞⁢μ⁢(X)1p. Now we take lim inf on the left and lim sup on the right side: ∥f∥∞-ε≤lim infp→∞⁡∥f∥p≤lim supp→∞⁡∥f∥p≤∥f∥∞. Taking ε↓0 gives limp→∞⁡∥f∥p=∥f∥∞.

Title 𝕃p vs 𝕃q
Canonical name mathbbLpVsmathbbLq
Date of creation 2013-03-22 15:22:05
Last modified on 2013-03-22 15:22:05
Owner yark (2760)
Last modified by yark (2760)
Numerical id 11
Author yark (2760)
Entry type Topic
Classification msc 28A25