notes on the classical definition of a manifold
Classical Definition
Historically, the data for a
manifold was specified as a collection![]()
of coordinate domains related
by changes of coordinates. The manifold itself could be obtained by
gluing the domains in accordance with the transition functions
![]()
,
provided the changes of coordinates were free of inconsistencies.
In this formulation, a manifold is specified by two types of information. The first item of information is a collection of open sets
indexed by some set . The second item is a collection of transition functions, that is to say diffeomorphisms
obeying certain consistency and topological conditions.
We call a pair
the coordinates of
a point relative to chart , and define the manifold
to be the set of equivalence classes![]()
of such pairs modulo the relation
![]()
To ensure that the above is an equivalence relation we impose the following hypotheses.
-
•
For , the transition function is the identity on .
-
•
For the transition functions and are inverses
.
-
•
For we have for a suitably restricted domain
We topologize with the least coarse topology that will make
the
mappings from each to continuous. Finally, we
demand
that the resulting topological space
![]()
be paracompact and Hausdorff
.
0.0.1 Notes
To understand the role played by the notion of a
differential manifold, one has to go back to classical differential
geometry, which dealt with geometric objects such as curves and
surface only in reference to some ambient geometric setting —
typically a 2-dimensional plane or 3-dimensional space. Roughly
speaking, the concept of a manifold was created in order to treat the
intrinsic geometry![]()
of such an object, independent of any embedding
![]()
.
The motivation for a theory of intrinsic geometry can be seen in
results such as Gauss’s famous Theorema Egregium, that showed that a
certain geometric property of a surface, namely the scalar
curvature, was fully determined by intrinsic metric properties of the
surface, and was independent of any particular embedding. Riemann
[1]
took this idea further in his habilitation lecture by describing
intrinsic metric geometry of -dimensional space without recourse to
an ambient Euclidean
setting. The modern notion of manifold, as a
general setting for geometry involving differential properties evolved
early in the twentieth century from works of mathematicians such as
Hermann Weyl [3], who introduced the ideas of an atlas and transition
functions, and Elie Cartan, who investigation global properties and
geometric structures
![]()
on differential manifolds. The modern definition
of a manifold was introduced by Hassler Whitney [4]
(For more foundational information, follow http://web.archive.org/web/20041010165022/http://www.math.uchicago.edu/ mfrank/founddiffgeom3.htmlthis link to some old notes by http://web.archive.org/web/20040511092724/www.math.uchicago.edu/ mfrank/Matthew Frank ).
References
-
1
Riemann, B., “Über die Hypothesen welche der Geometrie zu
Grunde liegen
(On the hypotheses that lie at the foundations of geometry)” in
M. Spivak, A comprehensive introduction to differential
geometry

, vol. II.
- 2 Spivak, M., A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry, vols I & II.
- 3 Weyl, H., The concept of a Riemann surface, 1913
- 4 Whitney, H., Differentiable Manifolds, Annals of Mathematics, 1936.
| Title | notes on the classical definition of a manifold |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | NotesOnTheClassicalDefinitionOfAManifold |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 14:14:47 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 14:14:47 |
| Owner | rmilson (146) |
| Last modified by | rmilson (146) |
| Numerical id | 11 |
| Author | rmilson (146) |
| Entry type | Topic |
| Classification | msc 53-03 |
| Related topic | Manifold |