## You are here

Homeproduct topology preserves the Hausdorff property

## Primary tabs

# product topology preserves the Hausdorff property

Theorem Suppose $\{X_{\alpha}\}_{{\alpha\in A}}$ is a collection of Hausdorff spaces. Then the generalized Cartesian product $\prod_{{\alpha\in A}}X_{\alpha}$ equipped with the product topology is a Hausdorff space.

*Proof.* Let $Y=\prod_{{\alpha\in A}}X_{\alpha}$, and
let $x,y$ be distinct points in $Y$. Then there is an index $\beta\in A$
such that $x(\beta)$ and $y(\beta)$ are distinct points in
the Hausdorff space $X_{\beta}$. It follows that there are open sets
$U$ and $V$ in $X_{\beta}$ such that $x(\beta)\in U$, $y(\beta)\in V$,
and $U\cap V=\emptyset$.
Let $\pi_{\beta}$ be the projection operator $Y\to X_{\beta}$ defined
here. By the definition of
the product topology, $\pi_{\beta}$ is continuous, so
$\pi_{\beta}^{{-1}}(U)$ and $\pi_{\beta}^{{-1}}(V)$ are open sets in $Y$. Also,
since the
preimage commutes with set operations,
we have that

$\displaystyle\pi_{\beta}^{{-1}}(U)\cap\pi_{\beta}^{{-1}}(V)$ | $\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle\pi_{\beta}^{{-1}}\big(U\cap V\big)$ | ||

$\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle\emptyset.$ |

Finally, since $x(\beta)\in U$, i.e., $\pi_{\beta}(x)\in U$, it follows that $x\in\pi_{\beta}^{{-1}}(U)$. Similarly, $y\in\pi_{\beta}^{{-1}}(V)$. We have shown that $U$ and $V$ are open disjoint neighborhoods of $x$ respectively $y$. In other words, $Y$ is a Hausdorff space. $\Box$

## Mathematics Subject Classification

54B10*no label found*54D10

*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag

Sep 26

new question: Latent variable by adam_reith