## You are here

Homeproof that a compact set in a Hausdorff space is closed

## Primary tabs

# proof that a compact set in a Hausdorff space is closed

Let $X$ be a Hausdorff space, and $C\subseteq X$ a compact subset. We are to show that $C$ is closed. We will do so, by showing that the complement $U=X\setminus C$ is open. To prove that $U$ is open, it suffices to demonstrate that, for each $x\in U$, there exists an open set $V$ with $x\in V$ and $V\subseteq U$.

Fix $x\in U$. For each $y\in C$, using the Hausdorff assumption, choose disjoint open sets $A_{y}$ and $B_{y}$ with $x\in A_{y}$ and $y\in B_{y}$.

Since every $y\in C$ is an element of $B_{y}$, the collection $\{B_{y}\mid y\in C\}$ is an open covering of $C$. Since $C$ is compact, this open cover admits a finite subcover. So choose $y_{1},\ldots,y_{n}\in C$ such that $C\subseteq B_{{y_{1}}}\cup\cdots\cup B_{{y_{n}}}$.

Notice that $A_{{y_{1}}}\cap\cdots\cap A_{{y_{n}}}$, being a finite intersection of open sets, is open, and contains $x$. Call this neighborhood of $x$ by the name $V$. All we need to do is show that $V\subseteq U$.

For any point $z\in C$, we have $z\in B_{{y_{1}}}\cup\cdots\cup B_{{y_{n}}}$, and therefore $z\in B_{{y_{k}}}$ for some $k$. Since $A_{{y_{k}}}$ and $B_{{y_{k}}}$ are disjoint, $z\notin A_{{y_{k}}}$, and therefore $z\notin A_{{y_{1}}}\cap\cdots\cap A_{{y_{n}}}=V$. Thus $C$ is disjoint from $V$, and $V$ is contained in $U$.

## Mathematics Subject Classification

54D10*no label found*54D30

*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag

Sep 26

new question: Latent variable by adam_reith