is irrational for (proof using Fermat’s last theorem)
Theorem 1.
If , then is irrational.
The below proof can be seen as an example of a pathological proof.
It gives no information to “why” the result holds, or
how non-trivial the result is.
Yet, assuming Wiles’ proof does not use the above theorem![]()
anywhere,
it proves the statement. Otherwise, the below proof would be an
example of a circular argument.
Proof.
Suppose for some positive integers . It follows that , or
| (1) |
We can now apply a recent result of Andrew Wiles [1], which states that there are no non-zero integers , satisfying equation (1). Thus is irrational. ∎
The above proof is given in [2], where it is attributed to W.H. Schultz.
References
- 1 A. Wiles, Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s last theorem, Annals of Mathematics, Volume 141, No. 3 May, 1995, 443-551.
- 2 W.H. Schultz, An observation, American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 110, Nr. 5, May 2003. (submitted by R. Ehrenborg).
| Title | is irrational for (proof using Fermat’s last theorem) |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | sqrtn2IsIrrationalForNge3proofUsingFermatsLastTheorem |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 13:38:32 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 13:38:32 |
| Owner | matte (1858) |
| Last modified by | matte (1858) |
| Numerical id | 13 |
| Author | matte (1858) |
| Entry type | Proof |
| Classification | msc 11J72 |