## You are here

Homesubharmonic and superharmonic functions

## Primary tabs

# subharmonic and superharmonic functions

First let’s look at the most general definition.

###### Definition.

Let $G\subset{\mathbb{R}}^{n}$ and let $\varphi\colon G\to{\mathbb{R}}\cup\{-\infty\}$ be an upper semi-continuous function, then $\varphi$ is subharmonic if for every $x\in G$ and $r>0$ such that $\overline{B(x,r)}\subset G$ (the closure of the open ball of radius $r$ around $x$ is still in $G$) and every real valued continuous function $h$ on $\overline{B(x,r)}$ that is harmonic in $B(x,r)$ and satisfies $\varphi(x)\leq h(x)$ for all $x\in\partial B(x,r)$ (boundary of $B(x,r)$) we have that $\varphi(x)\leq h(x)$ holds for all $x\in B(x,r)$.

Note that by the above, the function which is identically $-\infty$ is subharmonic, but some authors exclude this function by definition. We can define superharmonic functions in a similar fashion to get that $\varphi$ is superharmonic if and only if $-\varphi$ is subharmonic.

If we restrict our domain to the complex plane we can get the following definition.

###### Definition.

Let $G\subset{\mathbb{C}}$ be a region and let $\varphi\colon G\to{\mathbb{R}}$ be a continuous function. $\varphi$ is said to be subharmonic if whenever $D(z,r)\subset G$ (where $D(z,r)$ is a closed disc around $z$ of radius $r$) we have

$\varphi(z)\leq\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{{2\pi}}\varphi(z+re^{{i\theta}})d\theta,$ |

and $\varphi$ is said to be superharmonic if whenever $D(z,r)\subset G$ we have

$\varphi(z)\geq\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{{2\pi}}\varphi(z+re^{{i\theta}})d\theta.$ |

Intuitively what this means is that a subharmonic function is at any point no greater than the average of the values in a circle around that point. This implies that a non-constant subharmonic function does not achieve its maximum in a region $G$ (it would achieve it at the boundary if it is continuous there). Similarly for a superharmonic function, but then a non-constant superharmonic function does not achieve its minumum in $G$. It is also easy to see that $\varphi$ is subharmonic if and only if $-\varphi$ is superharmonic.

Note that when equality always holds in the above equation then $\varphi$ would in fact be a harmonic function. That is, when $\varphi$ is both subharmonic and superharmonic, then $\varphi$ is harmonic.

It is possible to relax the continuity statement above to take $\varphi$ only upper semi-continuous in the subharmonic case and lower semi-continuous in the superharmonic case. The integral will then however need to be the Lebesgue integral rather than the Riemann integral which may not be defined for such a function. Another thing to note here is that we may take ${\mathbb{R}}^{2}$ instead of ${\mathbb{C}}$ since we never did use complex multiplication. In that case however we must rewrite the expression $z+re^{{i\theta}}$ in terms of the real and imaginary parts to get an expression in ${\mathbb{R}}^{2}$.

It is also possible generalize the range of the functions as well. A subharmonic function could have a range of ${\mathbb{R}}\cup\{-\infty\}$ and a superharmonic function could have a range of ${\mathbb{R}}\cup\{\infty\}$. With this generalization, if $f$ is a holomorphic function then $\varphi(z):=\log\lvert f(z)\rvert$ is a subharmonic function if we define the value of $\varphi(z)$ at the zeros of $f$ as $-\infty$. Again it is important to note that with this generalization we again must use the Lebesgue integral.

# References

- 1 John B. Conway. Functions of One Complex Variable I. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, 1978.
- 2 Steven G. Krantz. Function Theory of Several Complex Variables, AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, Rhode Island, 1992.

## Mathematics Subject Classification

31C05*no label found*31A05

*no label found*31B05

*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new correction: Error in proof of Proposition 2 by alex2907

Jun 24

new question: A good question by Ron Castillo

Jun 23

new question: A trascendental number. by Ron Castillo

Jun 19

new question: Banach lattice valued Bochner integrals by math ias