## You are here

Homesuperadditivity

## Primary tabs

# superadditivity

A sequence $\{a_{n}\}_{{n=1}}^{\infty}$ is called *superadditive* if
it satisfies the inequality

$a_{{n+m}}\geq a_{n}+a_{m}\qquad\text{for all $n$ and $m$}.$ | (1) |

The major reason for use of superadditive sequences is the following lemma due to Fekete.

###### Lemma ([1]).

For every superadditive sequence $\{a_{n}\}_{{n=1}}^{\infty}$ the limit $\lim a_{n}/n$ exists and is equal to $\sup a_{n}/n$.

Similarly, a function $f(x)$ is *superadditive* if

$f(x+y)\geq f(x)+f(y)\qquad\text{for all $x$ and $y$}.$ |

The analogue of Fekete lemma holds for superadditive functions as well.

There are extensions of Fekete lemma that do not require (1) to hold for all $m$ and $n$. There are also results that allow one to deduce the rate of convergence to the limit whose existence is stated in Fekete lemma if some kind of both super- and subadditivity is present. A good exposition of this topic may be found in [2].

# References

- 1 György Polya and Gábor Szegö. Problems and theorems in analysis, volume 1. 1976. Zbl 0338.00001.
- 2 Michael J. Steele. Probability theory and combinatorial optimization, volume 69 of CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. SIAM, 1997. Zbl 0916.90233.

## Mathematics Subject Classification

39B62*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Prime numbers out of sequence by Rubens373

Oct 7

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag