Hilbert’s sixteenth problem
The sixteenth problem of the Hilbert’s problems is one of the initial problem lectured at the International Congress of Mathematicians. The problem actually comes in two parts, the first of which is:
The maximum number of closed and separate branches which a plane algebraic curve of the -th order can have has been determined by Harnack. There arises the further question as to the relative position of the branches in the plane. As to curves of the -th order, I have satisfied myself-by a complicated process, it is true-that of the eleven branches which they can have according to Harnack, by no means all can lie external to one another, but that one branch must exist in whose interior one branch and in whose exterior nine branches lie, or inversely. A thorough investigation of the relative position of the separate branches when their number is the maximum seems to me to be of very great interest, and not less so the corresponding investigation as to the number, form, and position of the sheets of an algebraic surface in space. Till now, indeed, it is not even known what is the maxi mum number of sheets which a surface of the -th order in three dimensional space can really have.[HD]
and the second problem:
In connection with this purely algebraic problem, I wish to bring forward a question which, it seems to me, may be attacked by the same method of continuous variation of coefficients, and whose answer is of corresponding value for the topology of families of curves defined by differential equations. This is the question as to the maximum number and position of Poincaré’s boundary cycles (cycles limites) for a differential equation of the first order and degree of the form
where and are rational integral functions of the -th degree in and . Written homogeneously, this is
The first part:
As of now neither part of the problem (i.e. the bound and the positions of the limit cycles) are solved. The difficulty of the problem can be
demonstrated by the fact that even the quadratic case is not solved (see Hilbert’s 16th problem for quadratic vector fields). The only known case
is the linear case where .
is called the Hilbert number.
Progress and attempts of the second part:
1981, An error is found in the proof of Dulac of Dulac’s Theorem by Yulij Ilyashenko.
1995, C. J. Christopher shows the following lower bound .[CL]
- CL C. J. Christopher & N. G. Lloyd, Polynomial systems: a lower bound for the Hilbert numbers, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 450 (1995), no. 1938, 219-224.
- DH Henry Dulac, Sur les cycles limite, Bull. Soc. Math. France 51 (1923), 45-188.
- EJ J. Écalle, Introduction aux fonctions analysables et preuve constructive de la conjecture de Dulac, Hermann, Paris, 1992.
- HD David Hilbert, Mathematical Problems (translated by Dr. Maby Winton Newson), Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 8 (1902), 437-479.
- IY91 Yu. Ilyashenko, Finiteness theorems for limit cycles, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1991.
- IY02 Yu. Ilyashenko, Centennial History of Hilbert’s 16th Problem, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 39, no. 3 (2002), 301-354.
- DRR Dumortier, F., Roussarie, R., Rousseau, C.: Hilbert’s 16th Problem for Quadratic Vector Fields. Journal of Differential Equations 110, 86-133, 1994.
note: Under construction! If someone can help with the first part that would be great. I will add reference to the historical notes when I go to school.
|Title||Hilbert’s sixteenth problem|
|Date of creation||2013-03-22 16:05:54|
|Last modified on||2013-03-22 16:05:54|
|Last modified by||Daume (40)|