inductive proof of binomial theorem
We prove the theorem for a ring. We do not assume a unit for the ring. We do not need commutativity of the ring, but only that a and b commute.
When n=1, the result is clear.
For the inductive step, assume it holds for m. Then for n=m+1,
(a+b)m+1 | = | (a+b)(a+b)m | ||
= | (a+b)(am+bm+m-1∑k=1(mk)am-kbk) by the inductive hypothesis | |||
= | am+1+bm+1+abm+bam+m-1∑k=1(mk)am-k+1bk+m-1∑k=1(mk)am-kbk+1 | |||
= | am+1+bm+1+m∑k=1(mk)am-k+1bk+m-1∑k=0(mk)am-kbk+1 by combining terms | |||
= | am+1+bm+1+m∑k=1(mk)am-k+1bk+m∑j=1(mj-1)am+1-jbj let j=k+1 in second sum | |||
= | am+1+bm+1+m∑k=1[(mk)+(mk-1)]am+1-kbk by combining the sums | |||
= | am+1+bm+1+m∑k=1(m+1k)am+1-kbk from Pascal’s rule |
as desired.
Title | inductive proof of binomial theorem |
---|---|
Canonical name | InductiveProofOfBinomialTheorem |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 11:48:06 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 11:48:06 |
Owner | Mathprof (13753) |
Last modified by | Mathprof (13753) |
Numerical id | 21 |
Author | Mathprof (13753) |
Entry type | Proof |
Classification | msc 05A10 |