inductive proof of binomial theorem


We prove the theorem for a ring. We do not assume a unit for the ring. We do not need commutativity of the ring, but only that a and b commute.

When n=1, the result is clear.

For the inductive step, assume it holds for m. Then for n=m+1,

(a+b)m+1 = (a+b)⁢(a+b)m
= (a+b)⁢(am+bm+∑k=1m-1(mk)⁢am-k⁢bk)⁢ by the inductive hypothesis
= am+1+bm+1+a⁢bm+b⁢am+∑k=1m-1(mk)⁢am-k+1⁢bk+∑k=1m-1(mk)⁢am-k⁢bk+1
= am+1+bm+1+∑k=1m(mk)⁢am-k+1⁢bk+∑k=0m-1(mk)⁢am-k⁢bk+1⁢ by combining terms
= am+1+bm+1+∑k=1m(mk)⁢am-k+1⁢bk+∑j=1m(mj-1)⁢am+1-j⁢bj⁢ let j=k+1 in second sum
= am+1+bm+1+∑k=1m[(mk)+(mk-1)]⁢am+1-k⁢bk⁢ by combining the sums
= am+1+bm+1+∑k=1m(m+1k)⁢am+1-k⁢bk⁢ from Pascal’s rule

as desired.

Title inductive proof of binomial theorem
Canonical name InductiveProofOfBinomialTheorem
Date of creation 2013-03-22 11:48:06
Last modified on 2013-03-22 11:48:06
Owner Mathprof (13753)
Last modified by Mathprof (13753)
Numerical id 21
Author Mathprof (13753)
Entry type Proof
Classification msc 05A10