vector fields: Lagrangian and Eulerian description
When we deal with vector fields defined over a continuum media, a suitable choice of coordinate systems becomes indispensable in produce on the continuum and the subsequent physical behavior that such a material media experiences. We shall discuss two possible methods that allow to approach the mentioned phenomena.
Some basic concepts and definitions
Let us consider a continuum embedded in an Euclidean vector space . This continuum, alternatively called body, can be either deformable or undeformable. Let be the region initially accupied by the body and any subsequently space occupied by that continuum. Each region of the Euclidean space filled by the body shall be called configuration. In a system of coordinates arbitrarily chosen, every particle of the body is identified in as a point of coordinates , and let this point be carried over to a point in , being its coordinates . Thus, the transformation of all the points in into the points in , indeed corresponds to a mapping which it can be expressed by
provided and are subsets of and the mapping represented by
occupying the body different regions or configurations in the space. The change of configuration that the body experiences we shall call it deformation. It is essential to understand that it is the body that deforms, not the space the body occupies.
Let us assume that Eq.(1) is a smooth continuous transformation (or deformation) and it can be inverted to the equations
then the equations (1) and (2) define the continuum or body on study. So far, we have introduced some basic concepts in to give a physical description of a continuum adopting different configurations as it experiences a deformation. We shall now consider a more general and formal description.
Material and spatial coordinates
Let be the coordinates defining the points of a continuum initially located in the region and let be the respective metric tensor. The are called material or Lagrangian coordinates which allow a description of the configuration . Analogously, let be the coordinates defining the position of points in the configuration , once a deformation of body ocurrs, and let be the correspondent metric tensor. The are called spatial or Eulerian coordinates which describe the space occupied for the continuum in the configuration . Thus, for instance, the squares of line elements in those regions and are given by
respectively. Consequently, whereas the Lagrangian coordinates describe an initial configuration of the body in , the Eulerian coordinates describe the region of the space occupied by the continuum once the deformation takes place. That very general scheme, in which the choice of material system is independent of the choice of spatial coordinates, was introduced by Murnagham .
Indeed those so-called descriptions are current erroneous German terminology, which refers as Lagrangian to the material coordinates that were introduced by Euler  and spatial coordinates as Eulerian that were introduced by D’Alembert .
Possibly a more useful scheme is that introduced by Brillouin , as it allows a suitable definition of motion of a continuum. In that case a parameter is introduced (usually the time ) and the approach requires that metric tensors coincide, i.e.
considering the motion as a transformation of coordinates. (See the motion of continuum for more details.)
It is relevant to mention that certain quantities which are relative invariants in Brillouin’s scheme, are absolute in Murnagham’s. In particular, if is the density of the media in and in , considering the Jacobian of the transformation, we have
With respect to the transformations of either spatial (Eulerian) or material (Lagrangian) alone, all of those quantities are absolute scalars, but if is considered as the transformed value of , then both values must be the densities in the and systems, respectively, therefore showing a fundamental difference between the mentioned schemes.
- 1 F. D. Murnagham, Finite deformations of an elastic solid, Amer. J. Math. 59, 235-260, 1937.
- 2 L. Euler, Lettre de M. Euler à M. de Lagrange, Recherches sur la propagation des ÃÂ©branlements dans une milieu ÃÂ©lastique, Misc. Taur. (1760-1761), 1-10 = Opera(2) 10, 255-263 = Oeuvres de Lagrange 14, 178-188, 1762.
- 3 J. L. D’Alembert, Essai d’une Nouvelle ThÃÂ©orie de la Resistance des Fluides, Paris, 1752.
L. Brillouin, Les lois de l’ÃÂ©lasticitÃÂ© en coordonnÃÂ©es quelconques, Proc. Int. Congr. Math. Toronto (1924) 2, 73-97
(a preliminary version of [1925, 1]), 1928.
|Title||vector fields: Lagrangian and Eulerian description|
|Date of creation||2016-05-24 22:37:07|
|Last modified on||2016-05-24 22:37:07|
|Last modified by||perucho (2192)|