4.3 Bi-invertible maps
Using the language introduced in Β§4.2 (http://planetmath.org/42halfadjointequivalences), we can restate the definition proposed in Β§2.4 (http://planetmath.org/24homotopiesandequivalences) as follows.
Definition 4.3.1.
We say is bi-invertible if it has both a left inverse and a right inverse:
In Β§2.4 (http://planetmath.org/24homotopiesandequivalences) we proved that and . What remains is the following.
Theorem 4.3.2.
For any , the type is a mere proposition.
Proof.
We may suppose to be bi-invertible and show that is contractible. But since , by Lemma 4.2.9 (http://planetmath.org/42halfadjointequivalences#Thmprelem4) in this case both and are contractible, and the product of contractible types is contractible. β
Note that this also fits the proposal made at the beginning of Β§4.2 (http://planetmath.org/42halfadjointequivalences): we combine and into a contractible type and add an additional datum which combines with into a contractible type. The difference is that instead of adding a higher datum (a 2-dimensional path) to combine with , we add a lower one (a right inverse that is separate from the left inverse).
Corollary 4.3.3.
For any we have .
Proof.
We have and . Since both and are mere propositions, the equivalence follows from Lemma 3.3.3 (http://planetmath.org/33merepropositions#Thmprelem2). β
Title | 4.3 Bi-invertible maps |
---|---|
\metatable |