## You are here

Homealeph numbers

## Primary tabs

# aleph numbers

The *aleph numbers* are infinite cardinal numbers
defined by transfinite recursion, as described below.
They are written $\aleph_{\alpha}$, where $\aleph$ is aleph,
the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet,
and $\alpha$ is an ordinal number.
Sometimes we write $\omega_{\alpha}$ instead of $\aleph_{\alpha}$,
usually to emphasise that it is an ordinal.

To start the transfinite recursion, we define $\aleph_{0}$ to be the first infinite ordinal. This is the cardinality of countably infinite sets, such as $\mathbb{N}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$. For each ordinal $\alpha$, the cardinal number $\aleph_{{\alpha+1}}$ is defined to be the least ordinal of cardinality greater than $\aleph_{\alpha}$. For each limit ordinal $\delta$, we define $\aleph_{\delta}=\bigcup_{{\alpha\in\delta}}\aleph_{\alpha}$.

As a consequence of the Well-Ordering Principle, every infinite set is equinumerous with an aleph number. Every infinite cardinal is therefore an aleph. More precisely, for every infinite cardinal $\kappa$ there is exactly one ordinal $\alpha$ such that $\kappa=\aleph_{\alpha}$.

## Mathematics Subject Classification

03E10*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag

Sep 26

new question: Latent variable by adam_reith