elementary results about multiplicative functions and convolution


One of the most important elementary results about multiplicative functions and convolution (http://planetmath.org/DirichletConvolution) is:

Theorem.

If f, g, and h are arithmetic functionsMathworldPlanetmath with f*g=h and at least two of them are multiplicative, then all of them are multiplicative.

The above theoremMathworldPlanetmath will be proven in two separate parts.

Lemma 1.

If f and g are multiplicative, then so is f*g.

Proof.

Note that (f*g)⁢(1)=f⁢(1)⁢g⁢(1)=1⋅1=1 since f and g are multiplicative.

Let a,b∈ℕ with gcd⁡(a,b)=1. Then any divisorMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath d of a⁢b can be uniquely factored as d=d1⁢d2, where d1 divides a and d2 divides b. When a divisor d of a⁢b is factored in this manner, the fact that gcd⁡(a,b)=1 implies that gcd⁡(d1,d2)=1 and gcd⁡(ad1,bd2)=1. Thus,

(f*g)⁢(a⁢b) =∑d|abf⁢(d)⁢g⁢(a⁢bd)
=∑d1|ad2|bf⁢(d1⁢d2)⁢g⁢(a⁢bd1⁢d2)
=∑d1|ad2|bf⁢(d1)⁢f⁢(d2)⁢g⁢(ad1)⁢g⁢(bd2)
=(∑d1|af⁢(d1)⁢g⁢(ad1))⁢(∑d2|bf⁢(d2)⁢g⁢(bd2))
=(f*g)⁢(a)⁢(f*g)⁢(b).

∎

Lemma 2.

If f is an arithmetic function and g and h are multiplicative functions with f*g=h, then f is multiplicative.

Proof.

Let a,b∈ℕ with gcd⁡(a,b)=1. InductionMathworldPlanetmath will be used on a⁢b to establish that f⁢(a⁢b)=f⁢(a)⁢f⁢(b).

If a⁢b=1, then a=b=1. Note that f⁢(1)=f⁢(1)⋅1=f⁢(1)⁢g⁢(1)=(f*g)⁢(1)=h⁢(1)=1. Thus, f⁢(a⁢b)=f⁢(1)=1=1⋅1=f⁢(a)⁢f⁢(b).

Now let a⁢b be an arbitrary natural numberMathworldPlanetmath. The induction hypothesis yields that, if d1 divides a, d2 divides b, and d1⁢d2<a⁢b, then f⁢(d1⁢d2)=f⁢(d1)⁢f⁢(d2). Thus,

h⁢(a)⁢h⁢(b)=h⁢(a⁢b)=(f*g)⁢(a⁢b)=∑d|abf⁢(d)⁢g⁢(a⁢bd)=f⁢(a⁢b)⁢g⁢(1)+∑d|abd<a⁢bf⁢(d)⁢g⁢(a⁢bd)=f⁢(a⁢b)⋅1+∑d1|ad2|bd1⁢d2<a⁢bf⁢(d1⁢d2)⁢g⁢(a⁢bd1⁢d2)=f⁢(a⁢b)+∑d1|ad2|bd1⁢d2<a⁢bf⁢(d1)⁢f⁢(d2)⁢g⁢(ad1)⁢g⁢(bd2)=f⁢(a⁢b)-f⁢(a)⁢f⁢(b)⁢g⁢(1)⁢g⁢(1)+∑d1|ad2|bf⁢(d1)⁢f⁢(d2)⁢g⁢(ad1)⁢g⁢(bd2)=f⁢(a⁢b)-f⁢(a)⁢f⁢(b)⋅1⋅1+(∑d1|af⁢(d1)⁢g⁢(ad1))⁢(∑d2|bf⁢(d2)⁢g⁢(bd2))=f⁢(a⁢b)-f⁢(a)⁢f⁢(b)+(f*g)⁢(a)⁢(f*g)⁢(b)=f⁢(a⁢b)-f⁢(a)⁢f⁢(b)+h⁢(a)⁢h⁢(b).

It follows that f⁢(a⁢b)=f⁢(a)⁢f⁢(b). ∎

The theorem follows from these two lemmas and the fact that convolution is commutative.

The theorem has an obvious corollary.

Corollary.

If f is multiplicative, then so is its convolution inverse.

Proof.

Let f be multiplicative. Since f⁢(1)≠0, f has a convolution inverse f-1. (See convolution inverses for arithmetic functions for more details.) Since f*f-1=ε, where ε denotes the convolution identity function, and both f and ε are multiplicative, the theorem yields that f-1 is multiplicative. ∎

Title elementary results about multiplicative functions and convolution
Canonical name ElementaryResultsAboutMultiplicativeFunctionsAndConvolution
Date of creation 2013-03-22 16:07:37
Last modified on 2013-03-22 16:07:37
Owner Wkbj79 (1863)
Last modified by Wkbj79 (1863)
Numerical id 16
Author Wkbj79 (1863)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 11A25
Related topic ConvolutionInversesForArithmeticFunctions