is irrational for
We here present a proof of the following theorem:
Theorem.
is irrational for all
To begin with, note that it is sufficient to show that is irrational for any positive integer (http://planetmath.org/NaturalNumber)11In this entry, and . (for if were rational, so would ). Next, we look at some simple properties of polynomial :
-
•
, with for all .
-
•
and are integers for all : as is a root (http://planetmath.org/Root) of order , unless , in which case , an integer. Since , the same is true for .
-
•
For all we have .
Now we can readily prove the theorem:
Proof.
Assume that for some and let
which is actually a finite sum since for all . Differentiating yields and thus:
Now consider the sequence![]()
Given the remarks on , should be an integer for all , yet it is clear that and so , a contradiction![]()
.
∎
The result could also easily have been obtained by starting with and integrating by parts times. Note also that much stronger statements are known, such as “ is transcendental for all ”22 denotes the set of algebraic numbers![]()
.. We conclude this entry with the following evident corollary:
Corollary.
For all is irrational.
References
- 1 M. Aigner & G. M. Ziegler: Proofs from THE BOOK, 3 edition (2004), Springer-Verlag, 30–31.
- 2 G. H. Hardy & E. M. Wright: An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 5 edition (1979), Oxford University Press, 46–47.
| Title | is irrational for |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | ErIsIrrationalForRinmathbbQsetminus0 |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 15:07:46 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 15:07:46 |
| Owner | Cosmin (8605) |
| Last modified by | Cosmin (8605) |
| Numerical id | 12 |
| Author | Cosmin (8605) |
| Entry type | Theorem |
| Classification | msc 11J72 |
| Synonym | is irrational for non-zero rational r |
| Synonym | irrationality of the exponential function![]() ![]() |
| Related topic | Irrational |
| Related topic | EIsIrrationalProof |
| Related topic | EIsIrrational |
| Related topic | EIsTranscendental |
