## You are here

Homeideal class group is finite

## Primary tabs

# ideal class group is finite

We give two proofs of the finiteness of the class group, one using the bound provided by Minkowski’s theorem and a second, more elementary, proof that does not provide the same computational benefits as Minkowski’s bound does. Both proofs rely on the following lemma:

###### Lemma 1.

If $K$ is an algebraic extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ and $0<d\in\mathbb{Z}$, then there are only a finite number of ideals of norm $d$.

Proof.

The norm of a prime ideal $\mathfrak{P}$ of $K$ lying over a rational prime $p$ is $p^{f}$, where $f$ is the residue field degree $[\mathcal{O}_{K}/\mathfrak{P}\mathcal{O}_{K}:\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}]$, and there are at most $[K:\mathbb{Q}]$ prime ideals lying over any given rational prime. There are thus only a finite number of possibilities for ideals with norm $d$ - simply factor $d$ into a product of prime powers and note that each prime power must correspond to one of a finite number of possibilities.

The finiteness of the class group now follows trivially from Minkowski’s theorem:

###### Theorem 1.

If $K$ is an algebraic extension of $\mathbb{Q}$, then the class group of $K$, denoted $\Cl(K)$, is finite.

Proof.

Minkowski’s theorem guarantees that each ideal class contains a representative integral ideal whose norm is bounded by a constant depending only on the field, and the lemma shows that there are only a finite number of integral ideals with norm less than that constant.

Minkowski’s theorem gives enough information about the size of the class group to be computationally useful in some cases (see the topic on using Minkowski’s constant to find a class number). It does, however, require quite a bit of machinery. To see in a more elementary way that $\Cl(K)$ is finite, one can proceed as follows:

Proof. (alternate proof of theorem)

By the lemma, it suffices to show that there is *some* constant $C$, depending only on $K$, such that every class in $\Cl(K)$ has a representative $I\subset\mathcal{O}_{K}$ with $\N(I)\leq C$.
For $u\in K$, denote by $T_{u}$ the linear map left multiplication by $u$, and let $e_{1},\ldots,e_{n}$ be a basis of $\mathcal{O}_{K}$ as a $\mathbb{Z}$-module (where $[K:\mathbb{Q}]=n$). Then if $u=\sum b_{i}(u)e_{i}$, it follows that

$\N(u)=\det(T_{u})=\det\left(\sum b_{i}(u)T_{{e_{i}}}\right)$ |

is a polynomial of total degree at most $n$ in the $b_{i}(u)$, whose coefficients are functions of the $T_{{e_{i}}}$ and thus depend only on $K$ (and not on $u$). Let $C$ be the sum of the magnitude of those coefficients.

Let $c$ be a class in $\Cl(K)$ and let $J\subset\mathcal{O}_{K}$ be a representative of the class $c^{{-1}}$. Consider $S=\{\sum_{{i=1}}^{n}r_{i}e_{i}\ \mid\ 1\leq r_{i}\leq\lfloor\N(J)^{{1/n}}+1\rfloor\}$. The cardinality of $S$ is strictly greater than $\N(J)$, while $\lvert\mathcal{O}_{K}/J\rvert=\N(J)$. So by the pigenhole principle, two distinct elements of $S$ are in the same $J$-coset of $\mathcal{O}_{K}$. Taking their difference, we get an element $0\neq x=\sum b_{i}(x)e_{i}\in J$, where not all the $b_{i}(x)$ are zero, and $\lvert b_{i}(x)\rvert\leq\N(J)^{{1/n}}$.

Now, since $x\in J$, using unique factorization of ideals in the Dedekind ring $\mathcal{O}_{K}$, we can construct an integral ideal $I$ such that $IJ=(x)$, so that $I$ is in the class $c\in\Cl(K)$. Finally,

$\N(I)\N(J)=\N(x)\leq C(\max(b_{1}(x),\ldots,b_{n}(x)))^{n}\leq C\N(J)$ |

so that $\N(I)\leq C$.

## Mathematics Subject Classification

11R29*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new correction: Error in proof of Proposition 2 by alex2907

Jun 24

new question: A good question by Ron Castillo

Jun 23

new question: A trascendental number. by Ron Castillo

Jun 19

new question: Banach lattice valued Bochner integrals by math ias

Jun 13

new question: young tableau and young projectors by zmth

Jun 11

new question: binomial coefficients: is this a known relation? by pfb