inverse Laplace transform of derivatives
It may be shown that the Laplace transform is always differentiable and that its derivative can be formed by differentiating under the integral sign (http://planetmath.org/DifferentiationUnderIntegralSign), i.e. one has
This gives the rule
(1) |
Applying (1) to instead of gives
Continuing this way we can obtain the general rule
(2) |
or equivalently
(3) |
for any (and of course for ).
Example. Let’s find the Laplace transform of the first kind and 0th Bessel function
which is the solution of the Bessel’s equation
(4) |
satisfying the initial condition . The equation implies that .
By (3), the Laplace transform of the differential equation (4) is
Using here twice the rule 5 in the parent (http://planetmath.org/LaplaceTransform) entry gives us
which is simplified to
i.e. to
Integrating this gives
i.e.
The initial condition enables to justify that the integration constant must be 1. Thus we have the result
References
- 1 K. Väisälä: Laplace-muunnos. Handout Nr. 163. Teknillisen korkeakoulun ylioppilaskunta, Otaniemi, Finland (1968).
Title | inverse Laplace transform of derivatives |
---|---|
Canonical name | InverseLaplaceTransformOfDerivatives |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 16:46:27 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 16:46:27 |
Owner | pahio (2872) |
Last modified by | pahio (2872) |
Numerical id | 11 |
Author | pahio (2872) |
Entry type | Derivation |
Classification | msc 44A10 |
Synonym | differentiation of Laplace transform |
Related topic | MellinsInverseFormula |
Related topic | SeparationOfVariables |
Related topic | KalleVaisala |
Related topic | TableOfLaplaceTransforms |