You are here
Home ›net
Primary tabs
net
Let be a set. A net is a map from a directed set to . In other words, it is a pair where is a directed set and is a map from to . If then is normally written , and then the net is written , or simply if the direct set is understood.
Now suppose is a topological space, is a directed set, and is a net. Let . Then is said to converge to if whenever is an open neighbourhood of , there is some such that whenever .
Similarly, is said to be an accumulation point (or cluster point) of if whenever is an open neighbourhood of and there is such that and .
Nets are sometimes called Moore–Smith sequences, in which case convergence of nets may be called Moore–Smith convergence.
If is another directed set, and is an increasing map such that is cofinal in , then the pair is said to be a subnet of . Alternatively, a subnet of a net is sometimes defined to be a net such that for each there exists a such that for all .
Nets are a generalisation of sequences, and in many respects they work better in arbitrary topological spaces than sequences do. For example:
-
If is a subspace of then if and only if there is a net in converging to .
-
if is another topological space and is a map, then is continuous at if and only if whenever is a net converging to , is a net converging to .
-
is compact if and only if every net has a convergent subnet.
Mathematics Subject Classification
54A20 Convergence in general topology (sequences, filters, limits, convergence spaces, etc.)- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Linear Algebra Combination Problem! by Bruce Lee
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
May 21
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord
Attached Articles
topology via converging nets by CWoo
nets and closures of subspaces by azdbacks4234
every net has a universal subnet by asteroid
accumulation points and convergent subnets by azdbacks4234
compactness and accumulation points of nets by azdbacks4234
continuity and convergent nets by azdbacks4234
topological properties and nets by asteroid



Comments
ordering of the net
Hi, I am new to this forum and am not in particular very good in set theory, but I could not quite comprehend the claim made in the first paragraph of the definition for "net", that xA<=aB iff A<=B. Doesnt the mapping have to be monotonous for that claim to be valid?
Regards,
Dinesh
Re: ordering of the net
> ... I could not quite comprehend the
> claim made in the first paragraph of the definition for
> "net", that xA<=aB iff A<=B. Doesnt the mapping have to be
> monotonous for that claim to be valid?
The statement in question is a definition. The defined order (on X) is "induced" by \gamma and the order on A. Perhaps the difficulty is that unnecessary confusion is introduced by using \leq ambiguously to denote distinct orders.
Unless you are saying more than I think you are, "monotone" works better than "monotonous".
Re: ordering of the net
thanks, that helped.
Re: ordering of the net
I think the claim is wrong. Consider x_n = (-1)^n. (Always a good example to try!) Then this sequence is a net defined on a directed set. Since 3 =< 4, the order you mention should have -1 = (-1)^3 =< (-1)^4 = 1, yet, in a similar way, taking 4 =< 5, arrive at 1 =< -1, and if this were really a partial order (let alone a directed set!) antisymmetry gives -1 = 1, a contradiction.