You are here
Home ›proof of Dehn's theorem
Primary tabs
proof of Dehn’s theorem
We define the Dehn’s invariant, which is a number given to any polyhedron which does not change under scissor-equivalence.
Choose an additive function such that and define for any polyhedron the number (Dehn’s invariant)
where is the angle between the two faces of joining in , and is the length of the edge .
We want to prove that if we decompose into smaller polyhedra as in the definition of scissor-equivalence, we have
| (1) |
which means that if is scissor equivalent to then .
Let be such a decomposition of . Given any edge of a piece the following cases arise:
1. is contained in the interior of . Since an entire neighbourhood of is contained in the angles of the pieces which have as an edge (or part of an edge) must have sum . So in the right hand side of (1) the edge gives a contribution of (recall that is additive).
2. 3. is contained in an edge of . In this case the total contribution given by to the right hand side of (1) is given by .
Since we have choosen so that and hence also (since is additive) we conclude that the equivalence (1) is valid.
Now we are able to prove Dehn’s Theorem. Choose to be a regular tetrahedron with edges of length . Then where is the angle between two faces of . We know that is irrational, hence there exists an additive function such that while (as there exist additive functions which are not linear).
So if is any parallelepiped we find that (since each angle between facets of is and ) while . This means that and cannot be scissor-equivalent.
Mathematics Subject Classification
51M04 Elementary problems in Euclidean geometries- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by jeremyboden
May 21
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord
May 17
new image: sinx_approx.png by jeremyboden
Corrections
word change by Mathprof ✓
please clarify by Mathprof ✘
capitalization of title by Mathprof ✓


