proof of Dehn’s theorem
We define the Dehn’s invariant, which is a number given to any polyhedron which does not change under scissor-equivalence.
Choose an additive function f:ℝ→ℝ such that f(π)=f(0)=0 and define for any polyhedron P the number (Dehn’s invariant)
D(P)=∑e∈{edges of P}f(θe)ℓ(e) |
where θe is the angle between the two faces of P joining in e, and ℓ(e) is the length of the edge e.
We want to prove that if we decompose P into smaller polyhedra P1,…,PN as in the definition of scissor-equivalence, we have
D(P)=N∑k=1D(Pk) | (1) |
which means that if P is scissor equivalent to Q then D(P)=D(Q).
Let P1,…,PN be such a decomposition of P. Given any edge e of a piece Pk the following cases arise:
Since we have choosen f so that f(π)=0 and hence also f(2π)=0 (since f is additive) we conclude that the equivalence (1) is valid.
Now we are able to prove Dehn’s Theorem. Choose T to be a regular tetrahedron with edges of length 1. Then D(T)=6f(θ) where θ is the angle between two faces of T. We know that θ/π is irrational, hence there exists an additive function f such that f(θ)=1 while f(π/2)=0 (as there exist additive functions which are not linear).
So if P is any parallelepiped we find that D(P)=0 (since each angle between facets of P is π/2 and f(π/2)=0) while D(T)=6. This means that P and T cannot be scissor-equivalent.
Title | proof of Dehn’s theorem |
---|---|
Canonical name | ProofOfDehnsTheorem |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 16:18:07 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 16:18:07 |
Owner | paolini (1187) |
Last modified by | paolini (1187) |
Numerical id | 7 |
Author | paolini (1187) |
Entry type | Proof |
Classification | msc 51M04 |
Defines | Dehn invariant![]() |
Defines | Dehn’s invariant |