proof of theorem about cyclic subspaces
We first prove the case . The inclusion is clear, since the right side is a -invariant subspace that contains .
For the other inclusion, it is sufficient to show that . The idea is that the action of on can ”isolate” the two summands if their annihilator polynomials are coprime. Let’s write for .
Since , there exist polynomials and such that
(1) |
this is Bézout’s lemma (or the Euclidean algorithm, or the fact that is a principal ideal domain).
Now is the projection from to :
(2) |
(by assumption that is the annihilator polynomial of ) and
(3) |
(by choice of and ), so
(4) |
Any subspace that is invariant under is also invariant under polynomials of . Therefore, the preceding equations show that . By symmetry, we also get that .
For the last claim, we note that the annihilator polynomial of is the least common multiple of and (that is a multiple of follows from the fact that must annihilate , and the set of polynomials that annihilate is the ideal generated by ). Since and are coprime, the lcm is just their product.
That concludes the proof for . If is arbitrary, we can simply apply the case inductively. We only have to check that the coprimality condition is preserved under applying the case to . But it is well-known that if (in or in any principal ideal domain) are pairwise coprime, then and are also coprime.
Title | proof of theorem about cyclic subspaces |
---|---|
Canonical name | ProofOfTheoremAboutCyclicSubspaces |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 17:32:53 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 17:32:53 |
Owner | FunctorSalad (18100) |
Last modified by | FunctorSalad (18100) |
Numerical id | 7 |
Author | FunctorSalad (18100) |
Entry type | Proof |
Classification | msc 15A04 |