proof of values of the Riemann zeta function in terms of Bernoulli numbers


This article proves part of the theorem given in the article.

Theorem 1.

For any positive integer n

ζ⁢(2⁢n)=(2⁢π)2⁢n⁢|B2⁢n|2⁢(2⁢n)!

where B2⁢n is the 2⁢nth Bernoulli numberDlmfDlmfMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath.

Proof. The method is as follows. Using Fourier series together with inductionMathworldPlanetmath on n, we derive a formulaMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath for the Bernoulli periodic function B2⁢n⁢(x) involving an infinite sum. On setting x to 0, this sum reduces to a constant times the appropriate zeta functionMathworldPlanetmath, and the result follows.

We first compute the Fourier series for B2⁢(x). B2⁢(x) is periodic with period 1, so

cn=∫01B2⁢(x)⁢e-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢x⁢𝑑x=∫01x2⁢e-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢x⁢𝑑x-∫01x⁢e-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢x⁢𝑑x+16⁢∫01e-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢x⁢𝑑x

We have

∫01e-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢x⁢𝑑x=0
∫01xe-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢xdx=-12⁢π⁢nxe-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢x|01+12⁢π⁢i⁢n∫01e-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢xdx=i2⁢π⁢n
∫01x2e-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢xdx=-12⁢π⁢i⁢nx2e-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢x|01+22⁢π⁢i⁢n∫01xe-2⁢π⁢i⁢n⁢xdx=12⁢π2⁢n2+i2⁢π⁢n

so that

cn=12⁢π2⁢n2

But then bn=cn-c-n=0 for all n, a0=0, and for n>0, an=cn+c-n=1π2⁢n2 (where an are the coefficients of cos and bn the coefficients of sin in the Fourier series). Thus

B2⁢(x)=∑k=1∞1π2⁢k2⁢cos⁡(2⁢π⁢k⁢x)=1π2⁢∑k=1∞1k2⁢cos⁡(2⁢π⁢k⁢x)

Using this case as an inductive hypothesis, assume that for some n≥2

B2⁢(n-1)⁢(x)=(-1)n⁢2⋅(2⁢(n-1))!(2⁢π)2⁢(n-1)⁢∑k=1∞1k2⁢(n-1)⁢cos⁡(2⁢π⁢k⁢x)

Then on (0,1)

B2⁢n′′⁢(x)=(2⁢n)⁢(2⁢n-1)⁢B2⁢(n-1)⁢(x)=(-1)n⁢2⋅(2⁢n)!(2⁢π)2⁢(n-1)⁢∑k=1∞1k2⁢(n-1)⁢cos⁡(2⁢π⁢k⁢x)

and thus

B2⁢n⁢(x)=(-1)n⁢2⋅(2⁢n)!(2⁢π)2⁢(n-1)⁢∫∫∑k=1∞1k2⁢(n-1)⁢cos⁡(2⁢π⁢k⁢x)⁢d⁢x⁢d⁢x

Since n≥2, the sum converges absolutely, so we can move the sum outside the integralsDlmfPlanetmath, and we get

B2⁢n⁢(x) =(-1)n⁢2⋅(2⁢n)!(2⁢π)2⁢(n-1)⁢∑k=1∞1k2⁢(n-1)⁢∫∫cos⁡(2⁢π⁢k⁢x)⁢𝑑x⁢𝑑x
=(-1)n⁢2⋅(2⁢n)!(2⁢π)2⁢(n-1)⁢∑k=1∞1k2⁢(n-1)⁢-14⁢π2⁢k2⁢cos⁡(2⁢π⁢k⁢x)
=(-1)n+1⁢2⋅(2⁢n)!(2⁢π)2⁢n⁢∑k=1∞1k2⁢n⁢cos⁡(2⁢π⁢k⁢x)

Thus we have established this formula for all n≥1. Setting x=0, then, we get

B2⁢n=(-1)n+1⁢2⋅(2⁢n)!(2⁢π)2⁢n⁢∑k=1∞1k2⁢n=(-1)n+1⁢2⋅(2⁢n)!(2⁢π)2⁢n⁢ζ⁢(2⁢n)

or, trivially rewriting,

ζ⁢(2⁢n)=(-1)n+1⁢(2⁢π)2⁢n⁢B2⁢n2⁢(2⁢n)!

But clearly ζ⁢(2⁢n)>0 for n≥1, so it must be that the B2⁢n alternate in sign, and thus

ζ⁢(2⁢n)=(2⁢π)2⁢n⁢|B2⁢n|2⁢(2⁢n)!

Note that as a effect of this proof, we see that the even-index Bernoulli numbers alternate in sign!

Title proof of values of the Riemann zeta functionDlmfDlmfMathworldPlanetmath in terms of Bernoulli numbers
Canonical name ProofOfValuesOfTheRiemannZetaFunctionInTermsOfBernoulliNumbers
Date of creation 2013-03-22 17:46:37
Last modified on 2013-03-22 17:46:37
Owner rm50 (10146)
Last modified by rm50 (10146)
Numerical id 5
Author rm50 (10146)
Entry type Proof
Classification msc 11M99